Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani Announces Growing California Team Endorsements Follow Successful California Swing
JoinRudy2008 ^ | 3/13/07

Posted on 03/13/2007 9:01:46 AM PDT by areafiftyone

New York, Mar 13 - The Rudy Giuliani Presidential Exploratory Committee today announced the latest members of a growing California team supporting Rudy Giuliani for President. The endorsements follow a successful swing through the state and an overwhelming response by Californians to Mayor Giuliani’s optimistic vision for the future and proven leadership.

In addition to Rep. David Dreier, Rep. Mary Bono and Rep. Devin Nunes, who have already been working to elect Rudy Giuliani President, the Mayor gained the support of Rep. Jerry Lewis, Anaheim Mayor Curt Pringle, Former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, Board of Equalization Member Michelle Steel, Assemblyman Ted Gaines, former California Republican Party Chairmen Robert Naylor and Frank Visco and actor and political commentator Dennis Miller.

“The Mayor is honored to have the support of so many prominent and respected Californians,” said Giuliani Exploratory Committee Executive Director Mike DuHaime. “Rudy’s optimistic vision for the future and proven leadership are clearly resonating with the people of California.”


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: dreier; electionpresident; giuliani; riordan; rudyendorsement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2007 9:01:49 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blackirish; Jameison; Sabramerican; BunnySlippers; tkathy; veronica; Roccus; Jake The Goose; ...

(((((RUDY PING))))


2 posted on 03/13/2007 9:02:47 AM PDT by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Laura Ingrham has a poll regarding Rudy's judge appointments.

I was unaware Mayors appointed judges.


3 posted on 03/13/2007 9:07:22 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Hey GOP if you nominate a cheater, I'm going to cheat on you and vote another party. I'm sure you understand.

This election is the Alamo for Conservatives. It is more a battle to win control of the Republican party than it is to win the election. There can be no other reason for such a parade led by trash.

Nominate General Pace.


4 posted on 03/13/2007 9:09:03 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Anyone with even a slight understanding of NYC politics and NYC courts understands that the legal community in NYC is overwhelmingly liberal. The panels chosen to investigate and approve judicial candidates are controlled by the local borough Democrat parties. Thus, in general, the only candidates “approved” by these panels are overwhelmingly liberal Democrats. Ultimately, the mayor has almost no practical effect on the process, and is left to choose from the best of the worst, so to speak. Genuine merit or legal acumen rarely factors into the panels’ approvals. Thus, there is an enormous difference between who Giuliani was able to pick in NYC and who he would be able to pick as president.

Another important consideration is that the judges the mayor appoints hear and decide low level cases that rarely involve any of the issues a federal judge would hear. In fact, these issues are so banal and tedious they are rarely heard by the NY Supreme Courts, which are the trial level courts in NY, much less the Appellate Divisions and the Court of Appeals. The judges the mayor is involved in selecting sit in City criminal courts (mostly misdemeanor and petty stuff), the family courts, and the Civil Court, which is essentially small claims court. Needless to say, these judges rarely deal with constitutional issues, with major statutory cases, or with issues that have major social/cultural implications.

There is almost nothing to infer from Giuliani’s NYC judicial appointments when attempting to guess who or what he might look to when selecting federal judicial nominees. The article is misleading and is an attempt to make conservatives (both judicial and social) doubt Giuliani and his commitment to place judicial conservatives on the courts.

5 posted on 03/13/2007 9:16:21 AM PDT by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Support a Real Conservative...



Freepmail me to join the Duncan Hunter Pinglist

Freepmail seanmerc to join the Veterans for Hunter Pinglist

Contribute to Duncan Hunter's Presidential Campaign -- http://www.gohunter08.com
6 posted on 03/13/2007 9:17:59 AM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Good one!


7 posted on 03/13/2007 9:21:39 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Anyone with even a slight understanding of NYC politics and NYC courts understands that the legal community in NYC is overwhelmingly liberal

Your boy is a lifelong member of the NYC legal community so that sounds about right.

Why did Giuliani cite his judicial appointments as one of the most important things he did as mayor?

8 posted on 03/13/2007 9:22:00 AM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

California: Rudy's Country.


9 posted on 03/13/2007 9:25:43 AM PDT by baubau (BOYCOTT Bank of America for Issuing Credit Cards to 3rd World Illegal Aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

I would be astounded if you really believed you could get more than a handfull to agree with you. BTW you won't be missed since 3 or 4 will replace your vote. If you ever really voted Republican anyway.


10 posted on 03/13/2007 9:26:07 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: garv

He meant as experienced in the process of picking judges. He has had experience in doing it. That is what he meant. As far as picking Republican judges - his hands were tied. There was no way he was going to be able to pick Republican judges. With the liberals in NYC it was either their way or the highway.


11 posted on 03/13/2007 9:27:51 AM PDT by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: baubau

It sure looks like it! Woo hooo!


12 posted on 03/13/2007 9:29:30 AM PDT by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: garv

Well, there it is then: "his hands were tied".


13 posted on 03/13/2007 9:32:30 AM PDT by tumblindice (the best lack conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Yep, the libs and RINOs here just love him.


14 posted on 03/13/2007 9:32:33 AM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
California Swing

Shouldn't that be "California swingers".

15 posted on 03/13/2007 9:32:33 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
That is, most assuredly, not what he meant. I'll post the transcript so we can see for ourselves.

In the meantime we can contemplate why someone would highlight their "experience" picking judges if their hands were tied and they had no control over the process. What valuable experience would be gained?

16 posted on 03/13/2007 10:02:15 AM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
HH: Will he help you pick judges if you are the president, and you’re making Supreme Court selections?

RG: He’d be one of the first people that I’d turn to for advice and help and assistance. And I was involved in the Reagan administration in the judge selection process, although that was run by the deputy attorney general, and I was involved in the U.S. attorneys and U.S. marshals. But I watched all of it, and I appointed 100 judges myself. And it’s something I thought of, when I was the Mayor, as one of the most important things that I did.

HH: Did you have a litmus test for those hundred?

RG: No. No, not a litmus test on a single issue, a philosophical test, meaning what I wanted to know was what’s their view of how you interpret the Constitution and laws? Are they…do the Constitution and laws exist as the thing from which you have to discern the meaning and the intent? Or are you going to superimpose your own social views? And I want, I like the first kind of judge, who is a judge who looks to the meaning of the Constitution, doesn’t try to create it.

Now, maybe you can explain what exactly he was trying to say? Why was he trying to determine his appointments philosophical view of the constitution? After all, his hands were tied and he had little or no control of the process.

17 posted on 03/13/2007 10:16:25 AM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Evidently Rudy doesn't feel his hand were tied quite as much as they would like us to believe.


18 posted on 03/13/2007 10:19:18 AM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
Yep, the libs and RINOs here just love him.

You bet they do!! Why with Arnold at our helm, he very well could be Guiliani's choice for VP... could he legally be the VP? Calif has been one of the most liberal of the states for a long time now~

19 posted on 03/13/2007 10:20:18 AM PDT by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; ex-snook

Y agree with him, I to will go third party rather then vote for Rino Rudy.


20 posted on 03/13/2007 10:23:30 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson