> If we humans are descendants from monkeys, as the
> evolutionists assert, then there should not be monkeys
> around as monkeys would have evolved into humans.
You really "think" you're making sense, don't you?
Huh?? Scientists think that one group of apes, in response to their environment, started evolving in a way that would eventually lead to homo sapiens sapiens. Why on earth should that cause the rest of the apes to go extinct?
It's as silly as saying "If I am descended from Irish ancestors [which I am], why are there still Irish people around?" (Yes, I'm aware that I haven't evolved from my Irish forebears; the point is that whatever happened to my ancestors, it didn't affect the rest of the Irish population.)
If you don't believe me, please note that the leading creationist organization Answers in Genesis agrees with me, and now lists this argument in their Arguments we think creationists should NOT use web page.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/dont_use.asp#apes
"Scientists think that one group of apes, in response to their environment, started evolving in a way that would eventually lead to homo sapiens sapiens."
First off, there is little or no empirical evidence that the above is true. But, assuming it is true, the goal of the evolutionists is not about science but about the destruction of Western Culture and the Christianity that gave rise to it. Organized Christianity won't let it happen, rest assured.