Good grief. Where is the control group? What about 3 sigma anomalies? 237 families is not a large enough database! Did they do the same thing with upper income families?
In other words - not worth the paper it was written on.
Like you, my husband is a very analytical.....'just the facts'...kind of guy.
His work depends on him knowing all information possible & determining the best solution......lives and millions depend on it.
However, unlike you, he understands there can be a disconnect of feelings/emotions/nurturing with a woman who would kill a child in the womb.
Not all women..
....but too many!
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.
I can't imagine any woman....unless she's completely devoid of feelings....
..can allow her unborn child to be brutally dismembered and pulled out of her womb....
..and not carry that particular horror imprinted/embedded in her psyche.
It really ramps me to hear such dismissive drivel such as not worth the paper it was written on
I have never considered you would react this way--say something like this
.....thought I knew you-(as well as anyone can know each other in cyberspace).
Guess I was wrong.
Thank you! Abortion issue aside, if you go to write a paper or do a study, do it right or don't do it. All this paper does is falsely validate anti-abortion sentiments and people who don't understand how to conduct a study will take this report as gospel without knowing how useless the data really is.