I do not think Hillary will win the nominataion. It will be either Richards or Obama or Algore. Hillary is positively the worst public speaker and debater I've ever seen in my life.
That's not the point. The point is that anyone seeking the nomination is going to have to fight for it, and nothing is settled 11 months from the primaries. The other point is that for you to show such contempt for conservatives, on a conservative website, who do not want a mostly liberal GOP nominee, tells me you are either stupid (which I do not believe) or you are simply a liberal republican who wants to fight to move the party in that direction.
This notion that only Rudy can win, therefore we must support Rudy is utter nonsense. ALL the dems are weak sisters, especially Hillary.
"Mr. Rockefeller represented 'a tradition in the Republican Party I've worked hard to re-kindle - the Rockefeller, Javits, Lefkowitz tradition.' -- Rudy Giuliani, New York Times, July 9, 1992"
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16762
I've already told you, I will support the person who wins the GOP nomination (unless he's anti-war). That is hardly showing contempt for conservatives. In fact, it's more than you do. I still think that it's right to support the person who will have the best chance of defeating Hillary in this poisonous political environment.
You say that a true conservative would be able to beat Hillary/Obama/Democrat. Unfortunately, that's the quintessential partisan delusion. Liberals, too, think that their election losses are becasue they watered down their ideology too much. Someone even wrote a book about it "What's the Matter with Kansas".