Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/16/2007 6:10:45 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

The world is a dynamic place...glaciers come and glaciers go...Anybody who expects the world to stand still and be the same always is going to be disapointed.


2 posted on 03/16/2007 6:17:22 PM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This still doesn't explain why the Ross tide mark, placed in the 1800's is above the waterline.


3 posted on 03/16/2007 6:19:49 PM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (The devil made me do it!,.......................................................( well, not really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Three-tenths of a millimeter a year! Man the pump handles! We're all going to drown!

-ccm

4 posted on 03/16/2007 6:21:54 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Let's see now:

---Yet the shrinking of Greenland and Antarctica remains crucial because together they hold enough water to make sea levels rise by 70 metres, submerging vast swathes of land and displacing millions.---

So:

---Having reviewed the latest data, the pair conclude that losses from the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica contribute 0.35 millimetres per year to the total rate of sea level rise, estimated at 3 mm per year.---

It would take 200,000 years @ 0.35 for them to contribute there 70 meters to our catastrophe and at a rate of 3mm/year it would take 23,333 years.

And what are we going to do? Buy carbon offsets?


5 posted on 03/16/2007 6:22:27 PM PDT by claudiustg (See the little faggot with the earring and the makeup Yeah buddy that's his own hair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

In other words … they don’t know what will happen!


6 posted on 03/16/2007 6:22:51 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

3 mm per year x 100 years = 300 mm per century or 30 cm per century or 11.8 inches per century rise, at the current rate.

Of course that could change, but I think Gore predicted a 20 foot rise - over what period I don't know.

I've heard 20 inches, too.


7 posted on 03/16/2007 6:24:10 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
current rise is due to the expansion of water as it warms

Say What?
8 posted on 03/16/2007 6:29:15 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
further south, there is no problems with ice formation, take a look at this glacier formed in the cinder cone of Mt St Helen's in just a few decades. Over the last 21 years, snow, ice and rock debris have accumulated behind the Lava Dome to an average depth of 100 meters (325 feet) thick.


14 posted on 03/16/2007 7:41:54 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
For those with memory recall: There was a ship, 100 years ago, called the unsinkable Titanic, which tried to make a maiden Atlantic crossing in record time.
Problem: An iceberg floated in her way, collided with this sip and caused this unsinkable boat to...sink.
The blame universally was attributed to the Captain who was judged to have disregarded icebergs floating in the Atlantic for the previous 100 years.
And this goes like that:
The Titanic sunk 100 years ago caused by the then well known fact that for the previous 100 years or a total of 200 years ice broke up...in Greenland and drifted into the Atlantic.
Haven't noticed any rise in sea levels yet or are catastrophic floods just around the next melt?
15 posted on 03/16/2007 8:18:10 PM PDT by hermgem (The same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; gruffwolf; BlessedBeGod; Lusis; ..

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


I believe a good bit of this has been debunked.
19 posted on 03/17/2007 6:05:46 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Fill a glass about 3/4 full with water...put in enough ice cubes until water level is at rim and some of the ice is projecting up higher than the glass rim. Set aside and let time do it's thing. I've yet to have the glass overflow.


20 posted on 03/17/2007 6:15:50 AM PDT by exmoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

First, sea level has been increasing at 1 to 3 mms per year every year since the end of the ice age. More precisely, the sea level has been rising at 1 to 3 mms per year since the bulk of the ice age glaciers disappeared about 6,000 years ago. Before that, sea level was rising as fast as 5 cms (2 inches) per year at the the heighth of ice age melting.

It is natural in an interglacial like we are in for the sea level to rise very slowly even after the bulk of the ice age glaciers have melted.

Other satellite measures show that Greenland and Antarctica are increasing in ice mass.

So as usual, the study is data selection and not telling the complete story, so that the general public is mislead.

The authors, however, will now be invited to all the great global warming parties and they will have their grant applications approved.


21 posted on 03/17/2007 6:17:21 AM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson