Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AZRepublican

Getting this case to the SCOTUS worries me, too. If the Court does to the Second Amendment what Roe v. Wade did to the sanctity of life, the issue of confiscation will be immediately be on the table. Imagine a majority opinion written by Ginsburg-it would be the death knell of gun rights and the Constitution. The liberals would like nothing better than to test our 'from my cold dead fingers' resolve, if they could get armed BATF agents to do it for them.


2 posted on 03/19/2007 2:35:29 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spok

Getting this case to the SCOTUS worries me, too.



Yes, but maybe it is better to just have it out now, instead of boiling the frog gradually.


4 posted on 03/19/2007 2:38:59 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok
Getting this case to the SCOTUS worries me, too

The time is now. If a 'Rat wins the Presidency in '08 - and after amnesty for illegals instantly creates tens of millions of new Democrat voters, it's a distinct possibility - we can expect to see 2 to 3 more Ruth B. Ginsberg clones on the Court in the not-too-distant future. We can't afford to take that risk.

6 posted on 03/19/2007 2:44:46 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

I don't think the DC court gets overturned very often. They're not exactly the 9th circuit.


9 posted on 03/19/2007 2:50:10 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

I'll die in the process, but I won't be the only one going down.


13 posted on 03/19/2007 3:11:35 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

Exactly, and with Stevens on the way out, it would have been better to wait...unless of course we win!


20 posted on 03/19/2007 3:22:06 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

Right, little to gain, much to loose by letting the court decide. I had to jump through some hoops, but right now I can carry concealed, own a variety of handguns, rifles and shotguns, and basically enjoy the intended rights of the 2nd amendment. If they mess with it, that could all end up on the table, or worse, use any decision to make things much worse. Even a favorable ruling probably won't give blanket access to machine guns and .50s, so going back to the SC seems like a risk.


25 posted on 03/19/2007 3:29:59 PM PDT by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

The 1st amendment is already crippled with Campaign Finance Reform and the USSC's decision that it is Constitutional. There is the Eminent Domain decision by the USSC. Then there is Roe v Wade. The 2nd is pretty much all we have left. Without 1 and 2 or any right to property or life, the rest of it is not particularly significant. NRA might just be right.


29 posted on 03/19/2007 3:41:28 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

I would say stay away from the Supreme Court also.


57 posted on 03/19/2007 6:29:33 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson