Umm, unlike Rudy and McCain, there are not 20 writers each day in the MSM or the CMSM (that's conservative MSM) writing about Hunter's history. They are too busy putting perfume on the turds known as the frontrunners to pay attention to conservative man who should be president.
FR will soon become a real treasure trove of info on this guy. Beats the hell out of reading 5 Rasmussen/CNN/Time polls each day here telling us a year before the primaries that Rudy can beat Hillary in Pennsylvania, doesn't it?
Actually I'm sort of enjoying the MSM/Dem quandry. Do they report that a Republican can beat their darling or do they not.
Granted these are early days, but early propaganda, repeated often enough, has a way of hardening into fact in the eyes of the electorate.
When you have a candidate that immediately elicits the response- 'Who's he?'--in all but a tiny minority of the electorate then you truly have an uphill battle that is almost impossible to win.
Digging up stories from 4 years ago in which your candidate plays a starring role is symptomatic of a campaign without any current 'buzz'.
I wish you well in your enthusiatic support of your candidate, but I hope that your attitude doesn't become hardened against politics and the front-runners when his campaign inevitably stalls out.
Well said pissant.
I've been supporting Hunter and will continue to do so...now investigating Thompson.....any thoughts on a possible Hunter/Thompson or Thompson/Hunter ticket? The idea is very attractive to me at this early stage in the game.
FMCDH(BITS)