Posted on 03/20/2007 9:36:38 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
Senate Democratic leaders recently unveiled plans to dramatically expand taxpayer-funded health insurance through the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) -- even as 14 states are running out of money to fund coverage in the program now, says Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute.
One reason SCHIP is in trouble is because it has allowed states to provide taxpayer-subsidized health care for adults and middle-income families, even when poor children go without coverage. For instance:
In 2005, 87 percent of Minnesota's SCHIP enrollees were adults, as were 66 percent of those enrolled in Wisconsin's program. In Arizona -- which has one of the highest rates of uninsured children in the nation -- 56 percent of those enrolled in SCHIP were adults. In addition, SCHIP funds are often used to insure children who are not in low-income families, says Turner:
In New Jersey, for example, Schip covers children whose parents earn up to three-and-a-half times the poverty line -- an amount that exceeds $72,000 a year. Sen. Hillary Clinton and Rep. John Dingell recently announced their own bill that would subsidize coverage for kids in families earning up to four times the poverty level -- or nearly $83,000 for a family of four. So what should be done? First, adults should not be eligible, says Turner. In addition, Schip should focus on America's poorest families; the program should assist only families who earn up to twice the poverty line, as the law originally intended.
Finally, it must be easier for states to utilize SCHIP as a premium-support program. It is relatively inexpensive to add children to family policies, but by making the process so bureaucratic, employer-provided plans are underutilized and families are split into private and public coverage plans.
Source: Grace-Marie Turner, "Health Insurance Folly," Wall Street Journal, March 17, 2007.
For text:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117408653808140017-search.html
For more on Health Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=16
thanks for posting. I get tired of the "do it for the children" scoundrels hiding behind children.
So for tax cuts your rich if you make more than $50,000 but for handouts your poor if you make $80,000. That makes a lot of sense.
Shakespeare for everyone!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.