TQC: To 8 As for the rest of what you wrote, it's just bilious grandstanding that has nothing to do with my original proposition. Merely a straw man argument" doesn't count as a denial of what you wrote? I think you need to start reading more closely.... 14
As you no doubt know very well the post you quote of yourself came after my post. My 15 post was a response to your 12 post. Thus I had not read your 14 post. You assert that what you wrote above (highlighted in red) was in your 12 post. It wasn't, isn't. It was in your 14 post. Just as obvious is that the time span between my 15 post and your 14 posts is 1 minute 27 seconds. So unless I was really fast -- which I'm not -- in reading and thinking/forming a response, writing it and posting it, I wouldn't be able to have read your post at 14 and done all that in just 1 minute 27 seconds. So what ever game you're playing it sure isn't honest. See my tagline.
??? What's *your* game? I mean, your very first post to me basically involved your throwing around idiotic accusations at me about criminalising CEOs and 3000 new regulations and laws a year - none of which had anything to do with any of what I had said previously in the post to which you were responding.
Face it - you just went overboard with an overblown and poorly thought-out response. It happens to everybody once in a while. Just deal with it and move on.