Posted on 03/21/2007 9:20:12 PM PDT by Huntress
Four years ago, a 17-year-old immigrant girl named Jesica Santillan died at the Duke University Medical Center, the result of a botched heart-and-lung transplant following a blood typing mix-up. Her story opened a window on potent myths and inflammatory perceptions surrounding illegal immigration, border crossing, scarce health care resources and the widely misunderstood way in which we allocate transplant organs in the United States.
It is worth revisiting the myths; more important, though, we should acknowledge the complex realities that ought to inform current debates about immigration and health care reform.
Myth No. 1 -- Jesica's case highlights how undocumented immigrants come here for free health care, and how they wind up taxing and burdening the rest of us.
Reality -- Studies show that immigrants come here for jobs. A recent study by the Texas comptroller argued that the taxes paid by undocumented immigrants more than cover the state services they use. And if we are going to debate border-crossing for health care, let's be clear on who's doing it: Americans, frustrated with our own medical system, who venture from northern border states into Canada for cheaper drugs, to Europe and India for surgery, and into Mexico for alternative medicines.
In the transplantation world, the phenomenon of pressing moral concern is that of wealthy Westerners traveling to developing countries to purchase kidneys or other organs in unregulated black and gray markets. These kinds of border-crossing highlight real crises that ought to command more public attention than the much-hyped immigrant health care threat.
Myth No. 2 -- Jesica's case, in which she received not just one but two sets of mismatched organs, shows how the transplant system can be manipulated, in this case by an undocumented immigrant family jumping the line ahead of others.
Reality -- The two factors that got Jesica into the transplant system were health insurance (through her mother's job), and the generous private patronage of a supporter named Mack Mahoney and caring citizens in Franklin County, where she lived. Most undocumented immigrants have neither.
Moreover, many critics have a naive understanding of the transplant wait list. It is not a first-come, first-serve grocery checkout line. Once Jesica was listed, a number of factors determined the "match," such as her size and the size of the organs available, the extent of her illness, the immunological specifics of the available organs and which of the 11 U.S. transplant regions she lived in. Contrary to what many believe, we do not have a national "sickest-first" policy, although one was proposed and heatedly rejected during the Clinton years.
Myth No. 3 -- After Jesica died, her family refused to donate her organs, even though she had received two sets of transplants, showing how foreigners and illegal immigrants take more than they give.
Reality -- Hispanics in the U.S. donate organs at rates equal to their population; we have little data on donation by non-citizens. In Jesica's case, her organs were probably not transplantable because her body had been suffused with immunosuppressive drugs to prevent her type O body from rejecting a type A heart. Although critics from Bill O'Reilly to Michele Malkin used the case to inflame anti-immigrant passions, such scapegoating belies how little we know about how non-citizens and undocumented immigrants give to the system.
To be sure, Jesica's misfortune carries many other lessons -- about malfeasance and error, about the nature of American generosity as well as its limits, and about malpractice (the case helped squash a Republican congressional drive to cap malpractice awards for pain and suffering). The case also points to the tremendous and growing gap in supply and demand for transplant organs.
U.S. demand for organs shot up fivefold from 16,026 in 1988 to 90,000 in 2006, according to a recent Institute of Medicine report. In 2003, Jesica was surely a victim of building frustrations around scarce supply and heavy demand in this unique winner-take-all arena.
Four years later, a tragic case that inflamed public discussion might now enlighten it. Rather than embracing the myths, we should remember what Jesica Santillan's life, cut short, tells us about the reality of immigration and the American health care system, and about how passions of the moment can blind us to the real problems we must reform.
(Keith Wailoo is Martin Luther King Jr. professor of history and health policy at Rutgers University. He is co-editor, with Julie Livingston and Peter Guarnaccia, of "A Death Retold: Jesica Santillan, The Bungled Transplant, and the Paradoxes of Medical Citizenship.")
What about private medical providers, Mr. Wailoo? Are they paid for the the services rendered to illegal aliens?
An 'undocumented immigrant' is an 'illegal alien that is breaking out law.
I never take seriously any claims people make without backing them up. This guy uses the "studies show" line of BS, without saying which studies and from where.
Is this guy on the same planet as the rest of us?
Is this guy on the same planet as the rest of us?
Okay, illegals pay the taxes to cover their "healthcare." Now, unto the burden they create in DWL, DWI, and DUI acccidents with fatalities. For starters.
"Okay, illegals pay the taxes to cover their "healthcare."
And if the illegal aliens hadn't stolen the jobs rightfully belonging to American citizens, American citizens would have paid those taxes to pay for their healthcare.
You're rigght. I shoulda put "pay" in quotations...
How many children does the typical illegal have in school?
Just one family with three kids is receiving nearly $30,000 in state services every year they are in school. How many working illegals without children does it take to pay that back in taxes?
I do not believe that they pay anywhere near what they cost us in just education expenses. Now add medical care, law enforcement, court time and prison time and is way over the top.
I googled Texas undocumented workers and health care and came up with a study by the Texas comptroller published last December. Carole Keeton Strayhorn issued the study which said undocumented workers added $1.58 billion in state revenue and used $1.16 billion in state services. In the same paragraph, in fact immediately following those figures, the article also states "However, local governments bore the burden of about $1.44 billion in uncompensated health care costs and local law enforcement costs not paid for by the state." So the good professor cherrypicked the study and disregarded the costs that the state does not directly pay through general funds.
Nam Vet
That is BS. My husband makes way more money than an illegal, the taxes he pays could not cover the cost of childbirth and healthcare for our entire family. And why are hospitals closing at such a rapid rate? Cause the illegals don't pay.
Gee, wonder who's SS# is being used to pay those taxes? What form of ID is the mother using to get her health insurance and a job?
Where's the GD Barf Alert?
#3 may be the only one that makes sense but he is only guessing?
If the author is to be believed, the costs were borne by a combination of her mother's health insurance, and a private benefactor (whose name was given, btw).
Here is the Texas Comptroller's report. (You could easily have found it yourself, you know.... the guy did reference it pretty specifically. I found it on the very first try.)
The report states that there are significant costs associated with illegal immigration. On balance, however, report concludes that:
The Comptroller’s office estimates the absence of the estimated 1.4 million undocumented immigrants in Texas in fiscal 2005 would have been a loss to our Gross State Product of $17.7 billion. Also, the Comptroller’s office estimates that state revenues collected from undocumented immigrants exceed what the state spent on services, with the difference being $424.7 million
So ... will you take his claim seriously now?
I wasn't talking about Jessica, I was talking about the Texas Comptrollers claim. Also, there is another post on this thread where someone actually looked up the report and pointed out that the reporter cherry picked this claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.