"In your blind rage of not having a "pure" candidate that walks on water and will bend to your bidding, you have turned into a one man band twisting everything about a candidate that will be a great president for the U.S. Shame. Shame."
Find me ONE post of mine where I demanded a "pure" candidate. Or make a retraction.
Will you do either?
My approach all along has been to wait and see. I know no candidate is perfect. Walter E Williams isn't running. But there's a difference between waiting for a 'best possible' conservative candidate to emerge and jumping on the bandwagon for the biggest liberal in the race because he has name recognition.
"shame" is relentlessly pushing a liberal republican on a conservative board, and ignoring all evidence of his liberalism because to do so would be inconvenient to the cause.
As I told you yesterday, I'm not supporting anyone yet. And as I've said several times before, I want to hear everything - good or bad- before I decide on a candidate. That is what the primaries are for - to weed out the bad candidates and produce a good one. I don't care if it's Rudy or Romney or Hunter Or Thompson - I want to know all I can about their record, their positions, and their past before I make a decision on who is going to get my support.
No my dear, you are much to "clever" for that. The old "wait and see - wait and see" stall you go with is getting tiresome.
Walter Williams would have a word or two with you. If not, I would want to know way.
Rudy isn't a liberal, no matter how hard you want to push that idea, no matter how many hundreds of posts you feel you need to make to hold back the tide of support for him. You don't want to hear anything. You are a disruptor, someone who is incapable of sane discourse, and to whom I've wasted too much time. You have a following. I hope they can kick the habit of flashbunny.