Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt

Did Bush fire all clinton's US attys when he took office in '01?


17 posted on 03/22/2007 10:29:12 PM PDT by uscabjd ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: uscabjd

No! That's unfortunate but there may have been a good reason.

Because it took several weeks for the President to even get to the WH - what with the recount after recount after recount and trips to court, etc. .. hitting the ground running was important. To have to stop and regroup and select 93 attorneys and get them through the vetting process may have seemed like the last thing they wanted to do .. considering all the other items they were already behind on.

Of course, in hindsight .. it might have been a better solution. At least the GOP was still in charge of congress and hopefully would not have made a stink about it.


19 posted on 03/22/2007 10:39:25 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: uscabjd

No. But several did quit


21 posted on 03/22/2007 10:48:52 PM PDT by screaming eagle2 (No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson