Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RacerF150

I'm not is disagreement about that, but I'm thinking the law won't support this guy's actions. That's all.


33 posted on 03/23/2007 6:11:50 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
I'm not is disagreement about that, but I'm thinking the law won't support this guy's actions. That's all.

Roger that.

34 posted on 03/23/2007 6:14:13 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Osama's mama wears combat sandals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace

I doubt the law will support his actions.

Deadly force is not justified in the eyes of the law in most states to prevent property crime. As per the article, the manager wasn't trapped or confronted, he persued the thieves, while displaying a weapon.

If one decides to arm themselves for their defence, it is their responsibility to know the laws covering the use of deadly force.

If you feel deadly force is justified to defend your stuff, work to change local laws (good job, Texas) or take your chances in court.


43 posted on 03/23/2007 6:44:11 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson