Don't bother. I think I read that. It was from a website called "The Agitor" who first reported it. The Parker lawyers weren't happy with the NRA but there were no particulars why they were unhappy.
I'm sure the NRA wasn't too happy with the conduct of the Parker lawyers but you can't argue with success.
That website IS the Parker lawyers post, not the Agitator.
It is the actual lawyer who won, describing his interactions with the NRA.
Now, you may discount it - I don't have a dog in this fight - but it is kind of hard to say, he wasn't there, wouldn't know.
Get it?
I called the NRA Institute for Legislative Affairs last week and asked them to butt out of the case. The person I talked to didn't even know the name of the plaintiff's attorney, Alan Gura.
You can see hear the documents that the NRA filed, in a blatant attempt to torpedo the case: http://www.gurapossessky.com/parker.htm