Oh good. Another ignorant poster heard from who doesn't know the meaning of the word spam. How absolutely Clintonian of you to alter the meaning.
*sighs* That's twice today I've been insulted as Clintonian (someone called me a Hillary pawn, which is essentially the same thing).
Spam is something posted over and over, repeatedly.
Using that definition, all of the posts about Rudy's liberal record (which I note you aren't even bothering to refute at all) ARE spam.
But, using that same definition, all of these Pro-Rudy polls (polls that are meaningless and have no meaning this far away from the primary) are spam as well. I recall a pro-Rudy Deroy Murdock article being posted FOUR times; can I call that spam?
All I'm saying is that I see no refutation of the information being posted; I only see "See no evil, hear no evil".