Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback

Im not ready to give up those women just because they are percieved as being lost causes for the party.

One by one.


422 posted on 03/26/2007 1:41:59 PM PDT by beansox (Burn A Battle In Our Hearts For The Battle At Hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]


To: beansox
Good, work on them one by one. Somebody working one by one got me to be a pro-lifer, in about 1987.

But what if that person, after talking to me and many other pro-abort youth, had said, "Listen, we can't nominate Geroge H. W. Bush for the presidency! He's a pro-lifer, he'll drive all these kids away!" Would they have been right? What if that same person, four years before had said "We're going to lose our butts! Geraldine Ferraro is a pro-choicer and Reagan will never be able to win running as a pro-lifer against a ticket with a woman on it! I've talked to a bunch of young people and I know this beyond doubt!"

That's the case you're making here, and you're just as wrong.

Lastly, I don't have my underwear in a bunch, but it really is insulting for you to assume that "Don't judge a presidential candidate by what a young girl tells you because she's not a swing voter" is my way of saying "screw those kids, they aren't worth anything." You really come off as thinking you're the only one who knows about or cares about any of this stuff, and it's somewhat belittling.

432 posted on 03/26/2007 2:21:59 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson