Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kitten Festival

The reason that Britain isn't aggressively pursuing this yet is that it is not clear whose waters they were in.

"The seizure of the British vessels, a pair of rigid inflatable boats known as RIBs, took place in long-disputed waters just outside of the mouth of the Shatt Al-Arab waterway that divides Iraq from Iran. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border. Saddam Hussein canceled the treaty five years later and invaded Iran, triggering an eight-year war. Iran disputes Iraq's jurisdiction over the waters near the mouth of the Shatt Al-Arab."

While this may provide the pretext needed to go into Iran, Britain probably wants to wait and see how the US will back them. Without congressional approval Bush may be reluctant to help.


7 posted on 03/26/2007 8:51:25 PM PDT by amchugh (large and largely disgruntled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: amchugh

Times sure have changed since the War of Jenkins Ear. And for the record, who cares what Iran's position is?


8 posted on 03/26/2007 9:13:37 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson