Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Attorneys Showdown
WSJ Commentary ^ | March 28, 2007 | George J. Terwilliger III

Posted on 03/28/2007 2:02:06 AM PDT by CutePuppy

The Attorneys Showdown

With subpoenas looming and Justice Department lawyer Monica Goodling taking the Fifth before Congress, the controversy over the firing of U.S. Attorneys grows closer to becoming not just a political fight, but a court battle. There seems little justification for a legal war, however, and the courts are not likely to enforce Congressional subpoenas to presidential aides.

At bottom, Congress wants a public airing of private executive deliberations concerning the removal from office of several presidential appointees. The president offered a private explanation; congressional committees responded by authorizing the issuance of subpoenas to presidential aides. A potential court battle between the Congress and the president on this issue is a new iteration of an old battle between two branches of government. If it ensues, Congress could lose as a matter of law and suffer politically as well.

Congressional powers are only those "herein granted" expressly by Article I the Constitution, which provides a long, explicit list of its authorities. In contrast, Article II of the Constitution provides that "[t]he executive power" is vested in the president and, while Article II contains enumerated powers of the president, it does not limit that authority to those expressed. Expansive executive authority reflects Alexander Hamilton's recognition that "[a] feeble executive implies a feeble execution of the government."

...

Congress may ask the president why he fired these officials and its members may disagree or question the rationale for removal, and do so in a very public way. That is politics. But it does not follow that the president's aides can be forced to come to Congress and give information under oath.

...

That is what should happen here, but if it does not, precedent and common sense lead to the conclusion that Congress will lose in court.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doj; schumer; usattorney; usattorneys
Yep, the subpoeans war is all over but the shouting, Congress will have no victory there. The shouting, however, will become louder and "Schumers" and "Leahys" will need to be shouted back.
1 posted on 03/28/2007 2:02:09 AM PDT by CutePuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
I think that even the DemoRats are becoming sick of their leaders tactics.
2 posted on 03/28/2007 2:06:55 AM PDT by garylmoore (Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Congress is invading both the province of the Executive, and the province of the Courts. Congress has no power to prosecute wrongdoing. They can subpoena only if they are pursuing a legislative goal.


3 posted on 03/28/2007 5:27:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson