[drzz]

LIBERALS, BECAUSE YOU ARE A PARTY OF DEFEAT YOU MORONS

[Fierce Allegiance]

A vote for Rudy is a vote for liberals.

[ChiTownBearFan]

Because people like conservative executives and liberal legislatures. And oh ya, PEOPLE LOVE RUDY, or as I like to call him, Reagan 2.

[goldstategop]

Two words: National Security. It may not matter to Americans who runs Congress since the worst congresscritters can do is trip over their shoelaces but what the President does has life and death importance. The country simply isn't ready for Jimmy Carter II.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[edpc]

Why, in poll after poll, including the new TIME poll, does that advantage seem to disappear whenever voters are asked to pick a president in hypothetical head-to-head match-ups among front-runners with solid name recognition?

Despite the efforts of the MSM and the Clinton Inc. publicity machine, people still know she sucks.

[ElkGroveDan]

It's because the vast majority of the respondents are going on name recognition and vague impressions this far out. The cross tabs and all the other small details from presidential polls right now are close to meaningless.

[cdcdawg]

might it be because Hillary Clinton is unlikeable? I know people who will hold their noses and vote for her, but I don't know anyone enthusiastic about her.

[marsapan]

Because Hillary really makes Americans uneasy, and Obama doesn't have the experience.

[3AngelaD]

Could it be that just the mention of Mrs. Clinton's name, after her husband's presidency, causes a gut, finger-nails-on-a-blackboard response in a great number of people?

[etradervic]

My tagline spells it out.

[Zeroisanumber]

Too early in the contest for these numbers to mean that much.

[marsapan]

Are the editors at Time distressing over this poll? Sounds like it. Let them squirm.

[longtermmemmory]

Time Magazin does not understand why their readership is plunging to zero. They are hardly competent to answer this question.

(hint to time: It is not because there IS an internet, it is because of what information is ON the internet)

[Liberty Valance]

Americans, left and right do not want either a Clinton or a Bush in the White House in '08! Other than that, anything is possible.

[Lancey Howard]

Remember, these polls generally include only the responses of living, non-homeless, non-senile-dementia, non-illegal alien, non-imprisoned felon respondents. Therefore, many Democrat voters' are never included in these polls.

[tkathy]

People know in their guts that Rudy would make a tough, powerful leader.

[rake]

The emerging anti-Hillaries, Obama and Edwards, suffer from low awareness at this point."

LOL!

[Eagle of Liberty]

Hey TIME, it's because you view this country as EVIL, as HORRIBLE, as WARMONGERING, AS THE OVER-ENTITLED ENEMY! You continuously do everything you can to view this country in a negative light and fortunately, there are still enough Americans out there who love this country and love our ideals, our successes, our past and have HOPE for our future. We do not want Socialism or liberalism and we still desire a country who will face danger head-on.

The Democrat Party has become simply this: an enemy of traditional American values and an enemy of the United States Constitution. You are more in line in your thinking with every dictatorial despot that exists today than you are with true Patriotic Americans. You raise the anti-war torch high, but only because you are not in power to take credit for the win. You ENJOY turning every one of America's successes around to use them as another reason why the rest of the world should hate us.

YOU FUEL THE WORLD'S HATE FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

[AU72]

The country already has Clinton fatigue.
And with the advent of the perpetual campaign, soon to get Obama fatique.

[HockeyPop]

Typical Time Magazine newsroom liberal culture: faggots, feminists and effete freaks.

[Xenalyte]

Liberals : why is the GOP still heading for '08 ?

Um, because that's the way time goes?

Because there's no way to head away from '08?

Because the GOP hasn't perfected the flux capacitor?

I give up . . . why?

(This has gotta be a trick question.)