Posted on 03/29/2007 11:02:02 AM PDT by UKrepublican
What irks me is that they went heavy on the woman, knowing she could be easily intimidated. Sadly it worked. I am sure that threatened with rape (or worse!) She is doing whatever she can to stay safe.
None of the men have made statements like this. It is likely that the only thing that the men would give the Iranians is the "Hawaiian good luck sign".
I find the Iranian actions disturbing.
Well, not sure if it's a signal but I did see that during at least one of the propaganda films she is standing with her finger alongside her nose.
Thanks, I wasn't sure. This should not be allowed to stand.
Maybe "Half"bright is now working for SkyNews...
Showing video of these uniformed soldiers in prison is a flat out violation of the Geneva Conventions, even if there weren't obvious signs of coercion... And where is the MSM outcry?
LOL. Thanks for that!
No, its a "disgrace" that a 25-year-old mother of a three-year-old girl is allowed to be a soldier in a war zone.
I don't entirely agree.Just as was the case with our pilots at the Hanoi Hilton,there are ways to communicate coercion particularly when audio or video recordings are concerned.Letters don't mean much unless they're released in the actual hand of the prisoner.
Should she have said "oh,go f**k a donkey,you filthbag" on the video she made yesterday? Probably not.But she could have done something (fast blinking of her eyes,perhaps) or made her statement in an unusual fashion or tone of voice.....
I don't know what rank she is but with 7 years in I would think that she would have risen to a rank of some authority...perhaps an NCO/Petty Officer.If I'm correct then I think she should know better that to appear completely docile and submissive in a propaganda video.
I think you miss the meaning behind the poll. It's not that the UK is really sorry, or even pretends otherwise, but if those words get our sailors back then is it worth it?
I still think NO, but the poll isn't suggesting Britain IS or SHOULD BE sorry.
Do you actively protest against female's in the American military?
Britian has responded by stopping the sale of kidney pies and Beatles records to Iran.
Our military,too,had women in combat roles.I don't know about you but I have a serious problem with women performing combat duties or serving in combat theaters...with the possible exception of medical personnel.
What we're seeing with this Royal Navy sailor is just *one* reason why I believe this.But it's a debate for another day.The immediate concern is getting the 9th Century knuckledragging mullahs to release these sailors quickly,unconditionally and unharmed.
"Should we say sorry to get our sailors back? Yes or No"
My initial presumption was that the Brits would do nothing. But now Iran is backing the Brits into a corner. At the same time the Iranians have backed themselves into a corner, they have miscalculated grievously.
Unless the Brits 1)totally Neville out in the end and get on their knees (which now I think they can't) or the the Iranians 2) humiliate themselves and let hostages go without Brits apologizing.......I think we are headed to a wider war into Iran.
...and to the Brits I say we stand with you fullspeed, there is no way that the US and Pres. Bush will let you down after how you guys supported us after 911. God, I wish I were 26 instead of 46.
Here's an easy bet. If the USA elects a dem, there will be another hostage crisis.
Why? Cuz they think Bush will retaliate and a dem won't. They're right.
Not short, but how's this?
"By demanding the immediate withdrawal of our forces from Iraq, as a condition of release of 15 British maritime hostages, Iran has identified its status as an enemy state combatant in the War on Iraq. To that end, the United Kingdom demands either immediate release or full adherence to the Geneva Convention regarding the protection and providence due uniformed prisoners of war. If these protocol are not observed in full, Great Britain reserves the privilege to invoke it's right to self defense and employ whatever means necessary to secure the release of said prisoners, up to and including decisive military force."
No, just mothers with little kids being used in war zones. Big difference.
Agreed, but the problem is how it will be portrayed and perceived and overall it will be seen as weakness. When you project weakness, it encourages more of the same. There are no solutions that come without a price.
I like it, but I still suspect brevity would drive it home better. And I include my bit as too long, as well.
Maybe a statement like yours as a background leading up to a summary pithy declaration.
Isn't it against the geneva convention that lib erals hold so dear that you cannot parade prisoners of war on television period? If so, where is the outrage from Cindy Sheehan, Sean Penn, and the rest?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.