Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UKrepublican

As freeper "GoldenPup" posted elsewhere....
"New't recent plan has some merit; (1)Back-channel to Iran to release hostages in "X" time or your one and only refinery will be destroyed and then, (2) A Navel blockade of Iran."


12 posted on 03/29/2007 11:08:20 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Robe

They should do that anyway. Giving the hostages back doesn't make this outrage Okay.


21 posted on 03/29/2007 11:11:00 AM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (A Day Late and a Dollar Short)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Robe

"(1)Back-channel to Iran to release hostages in "X" time or your one and only refinery will be destroyed and then.."



I don't like the back-channel aspect.

After all Iran is attempting to embarrass the UK in the eyes of the world, why should they be given a chance to save face?




30 posted on 03/29/2007 11:14:05 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Robe
Navel blockade of Iran

I though that was the purpose of the burqahs? :-) Sorry, couldn't resist, even in the midst of the this tense situation.

37 posted on 03/29/2007 11:16:22 AM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson