What's best for the country is put a conservative in office. I'd prefer to do that in 2008. But, if the only choices are Hiltery and Julie-Anna, the only hope for conservative in the White House would be in 2012 if the former won.
We can`t survive four years of Ms Clinton. To make things worse, Bubba is part of that package.
Dream on. If "Hiltery" wins in 2008 there's no four years and out. And by 2016 this country won't be recognizable in today's terms. "Conservatives" will be competing to see who can raise the most taxes for national health insurance by then.
What you guys fail to grasp about the "Rudy is no different from Hillary" fraud is, the winner sets the terms of the debate, sets the agenda, and deals the cards. Just look at the difference in the Clinton administration and the Bush administration. Clinton understood this, so we still have a government larded with Clintonoids--he had an agenda and he was serious enough about it to subvert the government machinery in order for his agenda to survive his leaving.
Bush has no idea about this, so he left the Clintonoids in place, and now the State Department, CIA, FBI, Pentagon, and god knows who else is actively working to advance--the clinton agenda. The Bush agenda, whatever it is at this point-- is dead in the water, floating around in some stagnant inlet somewhere.
Let Clinton II have eight years and god only knows what we will have to swallow-- but guaranteed, it will be bitter and it will be permanent. Giuliani is socially liberal, no argument-- but he doesn't have a driving need to remake the USA into a chickenshit totalitarian eurosocialist state like the Clinton Crime Family does.
It's a free country, (still--more or less) so you all have the right to your opinions, but you who can't see the differences in these crucial domains have no right to expect to be taken seriously.
Another conservative like GW turned out to be????