Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says Congress will fund Iraq war
AP ^ | April 1, 2007 | Mike Glover

Posted on 04/01/2007 9:51:40 PM PDT by Owen

SIOUX CITY, Iowa - If President Bush vetoes an Iraq war spending bill as promised, Congress quickly will provide the money without the withdrawal timeline the White House objects to because no lawmaker "wants to play chicken with our troops," Sen. Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) said Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: bill; demowhiteflag; funding; magicnegro; senatornelsonfl; surrender; traitor; veto; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: HonestConservative

Thank you HonestConservative, it's not surprising that you would share my point. See you on the flip flop.


21 posted on 04/02/2007 5:42:27 AM PDT by WINGED PEGASUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant

I want to see the President call these children back in from Easter Break the day after he Vetoes their pathetic attempt to make him look like the villain.


22 posted on 04/02/2007 5:44:48 AM PDT by WINGED PEGASUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WINGED PEGASUS

neoCOMs

I like it!


23 posted on 04/02/2007 5:58:10 AM PDT by HonestConservative (Snowflake extraordinaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

The Democrat/Socialists in Congress (which means all of them) are trying to undermine our troops, while Pelosi is trying to undermine our national policy against terror sponsoring states by visiting Syria. Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) also visited with the enemy in Syria in December 2006. The Democrat/Socialists are guilty of treason, by giving aid and comfort to the enemy, just as sure as if they were supplying weapons to the enemy. They embolden the enemy by signaling that the U.S. will quit the war, surrender, on a date certain. In war, any objective other than victory is treason.


24 posted on 04/02/2007 6:04:00 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative

I started using the term a couple of years ago on the net in response to Maureen Dowd, Chris Mathews, and others using NeocoN as a cutesy way of demonstrating antisemitism without being overt about their hatred for Jews and The State of Israel.

Later, I realized that the term liberal was another blind to mask the new communist. When we and others used the term Liberal than we were providing additional cover for what we are truly facing. I'm hoping that the vernacular changes and that our fellow Freepers and others will stop using the term Liberal and call a spade a spade: new communist, AKA NEOCOM.(plus, I know that they hate it. Not only because they know that we are pulling them out of the closet, but because it makes it harder for them to use their little Jew hating word)


25 posted on 04/02/2007 6:19:23 AM PDT by WINGED PEGASUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

I am not seeing much ongoing coverage of this. And the bill has not yet reached the president to veto.

We must not let this comment from Obama be swept under the rug. We must ensure the pundits talk about it in the evening, that funding is fait accompli and just awaits formalities.


26 posted on 04/02/2007 9:34:20 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson