Skip to comments.
Victory in Iraq...Bumper Sticker Ideas
4-2-07
| Bob J
Posted on 04/02/2007 1:21:34 PM PDT by Bob J
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361 next last
To: MindBender26
141
posted on
04/02/2007 4:02:55 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: NautiNurse
142
posted on
04/02/2007 4:03:26 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Bob J
NUKE 'EM TILL THEY GLOW!!SHOOT 'EM IN THE DARK!!
143
posted on
04/02/2007 4:04:18 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
To: Bob J
Q: What if they gave a war and nobody came?
A: (9/11 picture)
Not bumper sticker material, but...
144
posted on
04/02/2007 4:06:12 PM PDT
by
null and void
(To Marines, male bonding happens in Boot Camp, to Democrats, it happens at a Gay Pride parade...)
To: null and void
Al Qaeda: We Deliver
Coming to your neighborhood soon.
Just as soon as you abandon Iraq...
145
posted on
04/02/2007 4:10:35 PM PDT
by
null and void
(To Marines, male bonding happens in Boot Camp, to Democrats, it happens at a Gay Pride parade...)
To: null and void
Al Qaeda: We Deliver
Coming to your neighborhood soon.
After you abandon Iraq...
146
posted on
04/02/2007 4:12:19 PM PDT
by
null and void
(To Marines, male bonding happens in Boot Camp, to Democrats, it happens at a Gay Pride parade...)
To: tcrlaf
“It’s the same as “Bush Lied” or Illegal War For Oil” , or Bush’d War for his frat Buddies”
But those “talking points” did not work for the dims, Bush was reelected in ‘04 despite the constant caterwauling of these phrases. I believe I read the % of the Am public that believes Bush lied has remained pretty constant. People that want to believe it will, others think for themselves.
What we can learn from this is exactly what I’ve been saying. The left uses those phrases because they resonate WITH THEM, however, they don’t resonate with the general public. In other words, efforts to foist those opinions on the public have failed.
What turned public opinion were the mounting casualties and the constant drum beat and pics from the MSM that we were losing in Iraq and in fact maybe couldn’t win due to the religious rivalries and hatred between sunni and shia. This has been effective because the people who run the MSM are a whole lot smarter than the left wing fanatics that get out and carry idiotic signs to make themselves feel good but are not persuasive with the general public.
We should endeavor to be as smart as the MSM and avoid the mistakes of left wing fanatics.
147
posted on
04/02/2007 4:20:04 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: A Navy Vet
That’s a good one R. How about “...to a town...”?
148
posted on
04/02/2007 4:22:33 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Bob J
Here are some for liberals to piss them off
“I want US out of Iraq only becuase I hate Bush”
“I don’t care about the Iraqi children killed by terrorists. I’m selfish. Bring the troops back home”
“Yes, I want another 9/11 so let US retreat from Iraq”
149
posted on
04/02/2007 4:38:58 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: E. Pluribus Unum
150
posted on
04/02/2007 4:39:39 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: null and void
151
posted on
04/02/2007 4:40:27 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: Bob J
A little long, maybe, but see the tagline. (I’ve had it for a year or two now, I think.)
152
posted on
04/02/2007 4:49:14 PM PDT
by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Bob J
I have one
“Defeat the terrorist helpers in congress and you win the war in Iraq”
153
posted on
04/02/2007 4:54:10 PM PDT
by
ronnie raygun
(ID RATHER BE HUNTING WITH DICK THAN DRIVING WITH TED)
To: Wiz
“Surrender in Iraq
Because I Hate Bush”
That may be one political message we could use simply because it’s satire.
154
posted on
04/02/2007 5:04:22 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Stultis
Might be able to use that tagline...it isn’t specific to a party but the inferrence is there....
155
posted on
04/02/2007 5:05:43 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Bob J
One way or another I think you need at least one, maybe two or three, that hammer home the Vietnam parallel.
Here's a rough idea, off the cuff. Maybe it can be rendered pithier somehow:
VIETNAM: Strategic Significance -- LOW; Consequence of Defeat -- HIGH.
IRAQ: Strategic Significance -- HIGH; Consequence of Defeat -- ASTRONOMICAL.
156
posted on
04/02/2007 5:13:31 PM PDT
by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Bob J
One way or another I think you need at least one, maybe two or three, that hammer home the Vietnam parallel.
Here's a rough idea, off the cuff. Maybe it can be rendered pithier somehow:
VIETNAM: Strategic Significance -- LOW; Consequence of Defeat -- HIGH.
IRAQ: Strategic Significance -- HIGH; Consequence of Defeat -- ASTRONOMICAL.
157
posted on
04/02/2007 5:13:33 PM PDT
by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Stultis
Agreed, got to keep it to BS length though.
158
posted on
04/02/2007 5:21:09 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Bob J
159
posted on
04/02/2007 5:45:56 PM PDT
by
Corin Stormhands
(http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com * http://wardsmythe.com * http://www.rudyblogs.com)
To: Bob J
American troops:
Stand behind their mission
or stand in front of them
160
posted on
04/02/2007 5:49:06 PM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson