“Even better yet, until we abolish Socialist Security, make a marriage certificate equal to a birth certificate... NO MORE DEADBEAT PARENTS...”
...Meaning a couple, once married, could never be divorced? There are far too many “abusive” marriages for such a decree to ever be practical. Further, if the government is completely out of the marriage business - as we both have stated we would ultimately like to see - who would or could ever enforce such a law? The only marriage “certificate” a married couple would have would be from the church who performed the marriage. It would not be legally binding if the government was out of the marriage business.
Regarding “homos tak(ing) a hike on marriage,” well, same sex couples are going to do what they want to do, whether you or I like it or not. Frankly, I don’t care what they do - I just don’t want the government telling anyone you can/can’t be married, and then offering tax breaks, subsidies, or other ‘amenities’ to those it recognizes as married couples.
“Even better yet, until we abolish Socialist Security, make a marriage certificate equal to a birth certificate... NO MORE DEADBEAT PARENTS...”
...Meaning a couple, once married, could never be divorced?
No... it means for eighteen years we can hold you responsible and you are guaranteed a living hell if you are a piece of crap for a parent...
Regarding “homos tak(ing) a hike on marriage,” well, same sex couples are going to do what they want to do, whether you or I like it or not.
But, the secular question is: Can they make babies together? No? Too effing bad...
Was Freudian psychoanalytic theory of sexual stages in psychological development more accurate than accredited?
The Michael Jackson Complex is fixation on mutilation of and deviance with human anatomy in the media. It is a social psychosis catering to the lowest common denominator and generated with Pavlovian behavioral conditioning in popular culture.
Should we really be canonizing special societal privileges in the law based on idolatrous fetishes? Disability, welfare, Social Security, etc., etc., ad nausea...
The social psychosis generated by behavioral conditioning (Pavlov's salivating dogs) in the popular culture and the conditioned response to accept the false premises of mental illness or birth defect will be used as a political tool to systematically rob the public purse.
Then, we could have other self-inflicted mental illness and disease (aside from those we already do) subsidized by the government consolidating an ever increasing portion of the economy in the hands of the cultural Marxists.
Cultural Marxism has a goal to feminize males, making them docile and compliant.
Marijuana is a chemical warfare agent. Homosexual monogamy is a psychological and biological warfare tactic.
No man may become a law unto himself under the guise of freedom of religion.
Some of these liberal-tarians forget, it is THEY who advocate “separation of church and state.” Let me cram it right back down their throats...
It was landmark U.S. Supreme Court precedent Reynolds v. United States in 1878 that made “separation of church and state” a dubiously legitimate point of case law, but more importantly; it confirmed the Constitutionality in statutory regulation of marriage practices.
Now, it ain't so palatable to them, is it? They are the ones here bashing the religious folks, now they want to claim some mercurial, ever changing definition of freedom of religion? I'm not going to live in their hell...
If I cannot yell “fire” in a crowded theater, I don't think someone should be able to light one with a U.S. flag and call it “free speech.”
Of course, a lot of these traitors to the United States would also whine if we wanted an Amendment to ban homosexual marriage or flag burning, wouldn't they?