Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
The government shouldn’t interfere. Let people decide what best works for them.

The article is in error when they say it is a tax on poor people to use CFLs. The cost of the energy saved over the life of a typical CFL more than offsets the additional initial cost of the CFL. The overall savings is usually more than double the cost of the CFL. So if you’re poor, using CFL’s will make you a little less poor.

10 posted on 04/04/2007 1:52:55 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DB
The government shouldn't’t interfere. Let people decide what best works for them.

You must be a Conservative!
15 posted on 04/04/2007 2:40:32 AM PDT by Dallas59 (AL GORE STALKED ME ON 2/25/2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DB
The article is in error when they say it is a tax on poor people to use CFLs. The cost of the energy saved over the life

2 dollars a bulb is more than I can afford today.

17 posted on 04/04/2007 2:49:01 AM PDT by x_plus_one (As long as we pretend to not be fighting Iran in Iraq, we can't pretend to win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DB
So if you’re poor, using CFL’s will make you a little less poor.

That's only if they work as advertised - same light, lasting x times longer. What if they are actually more like the Hybrid vehicles? Widely advertised as getting 75mpg, but it turns out that was under ideal test conditions - real world experience has shown they get closer to 40mpg in normal use, much closer to any compact and hardly worth the $20,000 premium to buy them. In real world conditions, they don't save enough to offset the costs - a stark contrast to the rosy predictions. I suspect CFL's will turn out the same under widespread real-life conditions.

36 posted on 04/04/2007 4:13:57 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DB
The government shouldn’t interfere. Let people decide what best works for them.

Oh, I agree but I suspect the government fear runs much deeper: That liberal ideas can not survive on the open market.

And these are only a few. Lordy,lordy, how did the human race ever survive till now?
55 posted on 04/04/2007 4:44:19 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DB
The government shouldn’t interfere. Let people decide what best works for them.

Back to the re-education camps for you!

79 posted on 04/04/2007 6:08:22 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson