Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot

So in the particular case of Hamilton you concede that it was necessary to make the dollar exchangeable for gold?

If that’s so, then at what point did it become necessary or wise to break the link to gold? At the time Hamilton set up American finances there was very little specie in the U.S., far less than the amount of dollars in existence at the time of assumption.


38 posted on 04/06/2007 4:41:24 PM PDT by Pelham (California, Mexico's HMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
So in the particular case of Hamilton you concede that it was necessary to make the dollar exchangeable for gold?

Sure. Why wouldn't I?

If that’s so, then at what point did it become necessary or wise to break the link to gold?

What's so great about gold? Did it prevent inflation or deflation?

40 posted on 04/06/2007 4:49:31 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Pelham
Hamilton's best deed was to insist that the United States, which was virtually bankrupt, pay off all its debts after the Revolutionary War.

Linking a currency to gold may be beneficial to a young country with questionable finances. These days such countries link their currency to solid currencies like the dollar or the euro. Ultimately a cuurency's value depends on the stewardship of the government, its honesty, and truthful accounting. Gold standards tend to give a false sense of security, such as Bretton Woods in the 1960's or Germany of the 1920's.

42 posted on 04/06/2007 4:57:56 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson