Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain Suspends Persian Gulf Drills
Prensa Latina ^ | 4/6/2007

Posted on 04/06/2007 5:50:30 PM PDT by racing fan

London, April 6 (Prensa Latina) The British Navy suspended its maneuvers Friday in the Persian Gulf, where Iranian authorities captured 15 soldiers of the European country for entering their territorial waters.

The chief of the Royal Navy, Adm. Jonathon Band, considered it necessary to suspend the drills for the moment, and called for reviewing British patrol regulations.

(Excerpt) Read more at plenglish.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: britain; france; french; iran; surrendermonkeys; tailbetweenlegs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2007 5:50:33 PM PDT by racing fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: racing fan

The wrong message to send the thugs.


2 posted on 04/06/2007 5:53:17 PM PDT by Dog (I hate holidays...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

Sounds like they are getting ready to buy those French built carriers after all.


3 posted on 04/06/2007 5:53:17 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

The British are officially French now. A white feather needs to be given to every British citizen.


4 posted on 04/06/2007 5:53:48 PM PDT by racing fan (Go Team Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

Geesh, morons! Why don’t they just fly a white flag?


5 posted on 04/06/2007 5:53:53 PM PDT by greccogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Secret deal anyone!


6 posted on 04/06/2007 5:56:38 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

That’s what Lord Nelson would have done....NOT!


7 posted on 04/06/2007 5:57:47 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan
I know I have become cynical in recent years, but this has all the earmarks of a “deal”. As such it stinks to high heaven. Aw well, under the Peolsi/Lantos Democratic foreign policy, we would withdraw as well.
8 posted on 04/06/2007 5:58:09 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

Now that the Iranian Hitler has redeemed himself, we can rest easy. /sarc


9 posted on 04/06/2007 5:59:13 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (If the Moon didn't exist, people would have traveled to Mars by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

I searched for Admiral Band and found this article, from Jane’s Navy International, dated November 28, 2006:


UK navy chief fuels ‘quality versus quantity’ debate

By Richard Scott

The UK Royal Navy’s (RN’s) most senior officer has argued that the service should accept sacrificing quality for quantity if it is to maintain a surface fleet of sufficient size to contribute to maritime security operations on a global scale.

Speaking at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) ‘Future Maritime Operations’ conference in London on 22 November, Chief of Naval Staff and First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Jonathon Band said that while the RN had previously insisted on configuring its forces for high-intensity warfighting, the “financial and security” realities had persuaded him that there was a case for a larger number of less capable units for tasking in support of maritime interdiction and constabulary operations.

Adm Band’s comments come as staff in the Ministry of Defence and the RN assess capability and force-mix options for a projected Future Surface Combatant (FSC) to enter service in the 2017-20 timeframe.

The size of the RN’s frigate/destroyer force has seen a significant decline over the past decade, falling from 35 ships in 1996 to 25 today. Admiral Sir Alan West, Adm Band’s predecessor as Chief of Naval Staff and First Sea Lord, was public in his opinion that this level is too small to meet the full spectrum of taskings, noting that the figure of 25 was based on analysis of high-intensity warfighting tasks alone and did not address wider maritime security needs, or make any allowance for attrition.

236 of 726 words
© 2006 Jane’s Information Group
[End of non-subscriber extract]


10 posted on 04/06/2007 5:59:28 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

The chief of the Royal Navy, Adm. Jonathon Band, considered it necessary to suspend the drills for the moment, and called for reviewing British patrol regulations.

Who knows, we might be surprised, I doubt they would be
making them more lax eh.

Iranians could be getting unintended consequences...


11 posted on 04/06/2007 6:02:33 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

The Muslims must have the UK by the short hairs, or else UK promised to evacuate the gulf in order to get the hostages back. I don’t understand why or how they were captured to begin with. Just watch for ballooning Muslim takeover in UK. I wonder how the Queen is taking all this.


12 posted on 04/06/2007 6:04:40 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

The Muslims must have the UK by the short hairs, or else UK promised to evacuate the gulf in order to get the hostages back. I don’t understand why or how they were captured to begin with. Just watch for ballooning Muslim takeover in UK. I wonder how the Queen is taking all this.
_____________________________________________________

She probably isn’t taking it well. It doesn’t bode well for the UK no matter what. Maybe she will be the last British monarch?


13 posted on 04/06/2007 6:09:31 PM PDT by racing fan (Go Team Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog

The wrong message to send the thugs.


Exactly, and the British Navy should be reviewing the PROTECTION that it did NOT give to its people...my guess is some heads are rolling over that poor military decision and planning....


14 posted on 04/06/2007 6:09:38 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Exactly, and the British Navy should be reviewing the PROTECTION that it did NOT give to its people...my guess is some heads are rolling over that poor military decision and planning....

______________________________________________

Hopefully some heads will roll, but who knows.


15 posted on 04/06/2007 6:11:55 PM PDT by racing fan (Go Team Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Rule, Britannia … bye, bye!


16 posted on 04/06/2007 6:17:25 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

“The chief of the Royal Navy, Adm. Jonathon Band, considered it necessary to suspend the drills for the moment, and called for reviewing British patrol regulations.”

Need new regs????

NEXT TIME SHOOT THE BA$T^%&$ before they can steal hostages!!!!!!


17 posted on 04/06/2007 6:20:54 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
I know I have become cynical in recent years, but this has all the earmarks of a “deal”.

Unfortunately, it does indeed smack of a deal.

If the British stay backed off, then truly the West is in far more trouble than I would have thought.

18 posted on 04/06/2007 6:29:47 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

Bad move.


19 posted on 04/06/2007 6:30:42 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: racing fan

Pathetic! This incident just keeps looking weaker and weaker for England. “When challenged, give up” is the MO being displayed here. Watching their “officers” explain why they didn’t even try to fight in the press conference was disgusting.

What happened to our once brave allies? Is this the same nation that survived the Battle of Britain?

England had better re-grow a spine before they are under Sharia Law.


20 posted on 04/06/2007 6:36:48 PM PDT by CCGuy (USAF (Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson