Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House GOP Leaders Consider Backing Fred Thompson
Union Leader ^ | 7 April 2007 | Robert D. Novak

Posted on 04/07/2007 1:14:03 AM PDT by Doofer

Fred Thompson’s progress toward becoming a Republican presidential candidate will take a step with the return of Congress from its Easter break when he meets privately with a large group of Republican House members.

GOP House leaders had prepared last year to board George Allen’s campaign wagon before his defeat in Virginia for re-election to the Senate eliminated him from presidential consideration. They had been moving toward support of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, led by former Speaker Dennis Hastert’s endorsement. But many have stepped back from Romney and are looking hard at Thompson. One member of the GOP leadership who had been prepared to endorse Romney is holding his fire while he considers Thompson.

A footnote: Thompson will hit the campaign trail next month in advance of any formal announcement with a May 4 speech in Orange County, Calif. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has led GOP presidential hopefuls in lining up California support.

EASTER EGG POLITICS

(Excerpt) Read more at unionleader.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; jerithompsonnobeast; presidentelections; runfredrun; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2007 1:14:04 AM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doofer

This has potential!


2 posted on 04/07/2007 1:18:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

FredHead ping! :-)
Run, Fred, Run!!!


3 posted on 04/07/2007 1:21:54 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
I think Thompson is about to take all the air out of the room. That is IF he doesn't do a Bob Dole and completely emasculate himself in an effort to get people to "like" him (i.e. act like women on Oprah claim they want men to act).

Considering his life, I don't think Thompson has anything to prove, and unlike Al Gore or JFKerry he doesn't NEED to win the presidency to prove to himself he's a real man.

Thompson is conservative, but to paraphrase something once said of Bob Dole, he doesn't "look like he wants to evict a widow"--he's not scary, and the MSM will have a hard time portraying him as such. He can run on his record in and out of Washington, he won't take any crap from Chrissy or Olbergirl, and yet he knows how to behave in front of a camera, so the usual MSM tricks won't work on him. He's a great communicator, and he is on our side with the issues, but the moderates in the party would have no problem with him either because again he isn't "scary".

The only major roadblock is a huge one: The American people WANT to elect a woman or a black in 2008 "just because".

4 posted on 04/07/2007 1:23:06 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Looks like Rudy's ship has come in.

5 posted on 04/07/2007 1:28:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

I don’t know if Mr. Thomspon will actually make it (when was the last time a Senator won the Presidency?) but he’d make somebody one heck of a running mate if nothing else.


6 posted on 04/07/2007 1:29:34 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel ("...Mindless pack of trained Maoist circus seals."-www.iowahwk.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
when was the last time a Senator won the Presidency?

Richard Nixon 1974.

7 posted on 04/07/2007 1:32:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Oops 1972


8 posted on 04/07/2007 1:33:27 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Nixon had also been Vice President beforehand. I like Fred, but you need somebody with executive experience. That’s why I think it may still be Rudy (he made the “Ungovernable city” liveable again) or Romney. With few exceptions, most of our Presidents over the last 100 years have been Governors.


9 posted on 04/07/2007 1:41:30 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel ("...Mindless pack of trained Maoist circus seals."-www.iowahwk.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Not fair. Nixon was a VP.


10 posted on 04/07/2007 1:43:14 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

11 posted on 04/07/2007 1:45:54 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

I believe that Fred Thompson is so palpably more electable than ANY other Republican candidate on the scene or near ti, that within two weeks of an announcement he will have exceeded the fundraising of all other candidates combined, and will have over 50% in the polls.

Talk about sucking the air out of the room! Thompson will make five candidacies instantly unsustainable or laughably Quixotic.

Between now and Thompson’s appearance in Orange County in early May, he will already moved to a near second to Giuliani or he may even have pulled ahead. The pressure for Thompson to declare will be unbearable and I expect that he will have to announce at that event, or withdraw.

He’ll be murdering the other candidates without even arming himself.

Forget about precedent. It doesn’t matter this time.


12 posted on 04/07/2007 1:53:09 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
While it is true Nixon was elected President in 1972, at the time he was already President having been elected in 1968. In 1968 Nixon was a private citizen. From 1953 to 1961 he was Vice-President. He was a senator when elected VP.

yitbos

13 posted on 04/07/2007 1:56:52 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

“And they was kung fu fighting...them cats were fast as lightning...”


14 posted on 04/07/2007 2:02:48 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel ("...Mindless pack of trained Maoist circus seals."-www.iowahwk.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
he’d make somebody one heck of a running mate if nothing else.

Agreed. I think Rudy and Fred can be the other's running mate.

15 posted on 04/07/2007 2:09:07 AM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Nixon had also been Vice President beforehand. I like Fred, but you need somebody with executive experience

That's not going to be an exploitable issue with swing voters unless Gore gets the nomination on the other side, which of course is a real possibility.

16 posted on 04/07/2007 2:12:33 AM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Everyone but Rudy and Romney was/is a Senator. This election isn’t the same as the ones in the past. Apples vs Oranges.


17 posted on 04/07/2007 2:54:50 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael
If Hillary gets the Democrat nomination, it will be a moot point if both Fred and Hillary are Senators.
However ? Fred has more experience than Hillary had in Washington ( so what if she was first lady ).
John F. Kennedy was only a one term Senator, nobody is saying now that he lacked any kind of executive experience, and his families money got him to were he was.
18 posted on 04/07/2007 3:04:43 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

So far I like what he says about Illegal Immigration and how the open borders crowd actually hurt Mexicans who live in Mexico.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQLFfTd2l44


19 posted on 04/07/2007 3:24:55 AM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Forget about precedent. It doesn’t matter this time.

I agree.

Fred may not have the political pedigree of Reagan but he's almost as good a communicator. Fred will chew up Hillary and Obama in any debate with common sense conservative answers, the things most americans want to hear. He can get support from both the GOP base and moderates.

Rudy is way too liberal. He may appeal to moderates, however, many in the base simply will not hold their nose and vote for him. Romney will be plagued throughout the campaign with his flip-flops.

Remember the buzz Ross Perot caused just by saying stuff like "I'll roll up my sleeves, get under the hood and fix things"? He had a huge moderate following because he ran as an anti-politician. Fred can do the same thing. He'll make the rest of the pack look like a bunch of double-talking Washington insiders--something that americans hate. Given the choice between a fast talker with a resume and a straight talker with core conservative values, I'm sure most americans will vote for the straight talker.

Fred Thompson is the only chance the GOP has in '08.

20 posted on 04/07/2007 3:38:58 AM PDT by Tinian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson