Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: retMD
If there are other good reasons presumably that FDA committee was free to use them. On the other hand, they seem to be taking the action based on non-demonstrable linkage between inhalers and the ozone-hole over the Antarctic.

That's why I'm asking how many asthmatics there were on the committee ~ the next question is "why"?

On the face of it the FDA committee's recommendations seem to have been fraudulently developed and proposed.

12 posted on 04/07/2007 7:22:51 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

I have no idea what went into it, but if the committee members were asthmatics and medical professionals, they might see it as a way to protect other asthmatics against a bad drug. There’s a reason that doctors, asthmatic or not, don’t recommend the stuff. Asthmatics on the committee wouldn’t change that.


13 posted on 04/07/2007 7:26:24 PM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

I also know that albuterol and other changed their propellant system to comply with regulations. I wonder why Primatine couldn’t do the same.


14 posted on 04/07/2007 7:28:34 PM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson