Posted on 04/11/2007 8:43:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker
I’ve always loved that cartoon.
They should be hit with the costs for their trivial lawsuits.
What they seem to want is a judicial equivalent of a “heads I win, tails you lose” coin toss.
Clippy meets vi, then both are swallowed by Emacs
I actually get it now that I’ve been using vi quite a bit...
For whatever reason, I didn’t catch on to Emacs—a lot in pico (with my Unix class), and vi at work...
I should probably learn how to at least do basic stuff in Emacs though...
This is a good start. I won’t be completely happy till the defendants get trebled RICO damages, since this is clearly a scam.
I do prefer emacs command line editing (set -o emacs) though.
Good, hope these maggots get taken to the cleaners.
I’m happy for the lady, but I’m even happier for later victims, as now precedent has been set twice. No more free ride for the copyright cartel in its abuses of our justice system.
I haven’t done command-line editing yet...8^)
What RIAA is doing is not much different than what Nifong did to the Duke laCrosse players. They create lawsuits without sufficient evidence to prosecute.
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Don’t forget how the race baiters and the FRAUDcasters and the Duke,et al “intelligensia” supported them. This is SO much like the way the intelligensia has hopped on the global alarmist bandwagon, too... Must suppress all evidence to the effect that they’re not seeing and acting rationally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.