Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59; SierraWasp
Forcing people to buy auto insurance is unconstitutional as far as I am concerned.

I seriously doubt you can substantiate that assertion. The US Constitution is mute on the matter of regulating insurance within the states (as it should be, as to prohibit such a measure would be a usurpation of power to regulate commerce within the states). So please show us where this provision is prohibited in the California Constitution.

63 posted on 04/12/2007 9:07:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie; calex59
Congress is considering at this very time a repeal of the McCarren Act (I think that's what it's called) that will reverse over 60 years of post depression state regulation of the insurance industry and make it federally regulated.

Strangely, there are those in the industry that are clamoring for this as more efficient. They hate having to get something approved for sale in 50 different jurisdictions!

But Congress repealed another post depression act in the Clinton years that kept banks and insurance operations completely out of each other's arenas as well as investment bankers and stock brokerages. All three were separated to stop the collusion. Now it's beginning to return but nobody cares.

Who cares about any of these old laws brought on the the crash and depression? Afterall, we've got Waxman and all the Damnocrats to legislate and tax our A$$es off!!!

WaaaaaaaaaaaaaHoooooooooooooo!!! (Slim Pickens in Dr. Strangelove)

70 posted on 04/12/2007 9:57:57 PM PDT by SierraWasp (CA is pleagued with a GANG-GREENOUS REPELLICAN GOVERNOR!!! He's worsened the Gray Davis' MESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson