Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leading Democrat says party leaders must not back down on war debate (Rahm Emanuel)
AP on North County Times ^ | 4/12/07 | Anne Flaherty - ap

Posted on 04/12/2007 10:06:01 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON -- A memo from a top House Democrat says party leaders must not yield to White House pressure on Iraq and should cast President Bush as increasingly detached from public opinion.

Bush has said he will not negotiate with Democrats on legislation that would finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through September if it sets an end date for the Iraq war. Holding only a narrow majority in Congress, Democrats do not have enough votes to override the president's veto.

In a memo to party leaders, Rep. Rahm Emanuel says that so long as Democrats continue to ratchet up the pressure on Bush, the president loses ground.

If Bush continues to refuse to negotiate, his "continued insistence on a blank check for the war will only further damage his standing with the American people," wrote Emanuel, D-Ill., a member of the House Democratic leadership.

Emanuel said he believes Democrats should continue to push to negotiate with the president. Despite differences, "there are areas of agreement that should offer fertile ground for negotiation and compromise," he wrote.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was in lock step Thursday with the approach, insisting Democrats will send Bush a bill by the end of the month that would include some sort of timetable for withdrawing troops.

"Certainly we're not going to back down on what we think is right for the country," said Reid, D-Nev.

Reid said he will accept the president's invitation to meet next week at the White House, along with other Republican and Democratic leaders. But, he said, he will insist the meeting be a two-way discussion.

Bush has repeatedly urged the American public and lawmakers to give his troop increase in Iraq a chance to work.

"It is in our interest to help this young democracy be in a position so it can sustain itself and govern itself and defend itself against these extremists and radicals," Bush said Thursday in the White House's Roosevelt Room after meeting with educational leaders.

Acting Army Secretary Pete Geren told lawmakers Thursday that a decision to keep troops in combat longer was based on recommendations from rank-and-file soldiers who wanted more predictability.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced a day earlier that he planned to extend troops' 12-month tours in Iraq and Afghanistan into 15-month stays. The Pentagon says lengthier stays in Iraq would allow Bush's 30,000 troop buildup in Baghdad to last for another year, if needed.

Soldiers said they would be willing to brave extended tours in Iraq or Afghanistan if it meant being able to tell their families they would be home for a full year before being sent back, Geren said.

Predictability was a more important factor "than the impact of the additional three months on the tour," Geren said. "It's a judgment call, but it's based on the feedback from the input from soldiers, from (noncommissioned officers) right up to the top leaders in the Army."

Democrats are seizing on the Pentagon's decision to extend troops' combat tours as evidence that Bush's war policy is failing.

"My view is that the strategy doesn't justify continuing abuse" of soldiers "who have put their lives literally in the hands of our leadership," said Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va. "I think there are limits to human endurance and I think there are limits to what families can put up with."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: backdown; dhimmicrats; islamophiles; islamophilia; leadingdemocrat; partyleaders; rahmemanuel; traitors; treason; wardebate

1 posted on 04/12/2007 10:06:04 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh, but they support the troops, right? I am so sick of the political games they’re playing!!

Hi, Norm, just having a bad moment here. I could just scream!


2 posted on 04/12/2007 10:11:41 PM PDT by Chena (I want a President who will also be tough against liberalism. (Kevin McCullough))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Stay the course?

What irony.

3 posted on 04/12/2007 10:13:18 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chena

They are the lowest of the low,, using military vets to turn on their own country and its foreign policy.


4 posted on 04/12/2007 10:17:24 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... BumP'n'Run 'Right-Wing Extremist' since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good news indeed. Please stand your ground Dims .
I don’t want the Dims to squirm out of this debate , I want them to be soundly and publicly defeated . This is one area that Bush won’t back down, and I truly believe the Dims are completely mis-under-estimating him .


5 posted on 04/12/2007 10:26:35 PM PDT by Neu Pragmatist (Is Romney the next Reagan ? ....Perhaps ,... We shall see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Someone needs to give Rahm a good old-fashioned swirlee.


6 posted on 04/12/2007 10:27:08 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Harry Reid is a wimp. He’ll back down as soon as he sees he is up against an immovable object. That is, is GWB stays on course.

Rahm Emanuel is tough, but he’s asking a lot from the Dems.


7 posted on 04/12/2007 10:30:04 PM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Rahm Emanuel ...a foul-mouthed ballet dancer from Chicago ....

8 posted on 04/12/2007 10:47:48 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
his "continued insistence on a blank check for the war will only further damage his standing with the American people," wrote Emanuel, D-Ill.,

This only works 'till another U.S. city gets smoked.

Let's see, the terrorists are very patient, might they wait 'till '08? Is this the mission behind the mission Pelosi is on?

9 posted on 04/12/2007 10:50:05 PM PDT by budwiesest (We need a 'divider' this time around. No more 'uniting'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Leading Democrat says party leaders must not back down on war debate

DAMN RIGHT! Lets hold the debate on FOX and see who shows up!

10 posted on 04/12/2007 11:15:44 PM PDT by Bommer (Global Warming: The only warming phenomena that occurs in the Summer and ends in the Winter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Once again Rahm good “buddy” you and your traitorous Dumbs have your head where the sun don’t shine. Amen.
11 posted on 04/13/2007 4:42:51 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson