Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Unfortunately, he just reverted back to where he was in 1996...before he decided he needed the votes of prolife conservatives.

Forbes called himself pro-life, but he was not pro-life, he was pro-choice. He said he was for more restrictions on abortion in late pregnancy and for restrictions on sex selection abortions, but ultimately he was for any woman in the first or second trimester having full choice. That is not a pro-life position, no matter how you cut it.

55 posted on 04/14/2007 12:08:49 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Elyse

Absolutely. And we’ve got several Republican candidates this time around who are playing the same deceptive games.


56 posted on 04/14/2007 12:09:40 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Laws that infringe on unalienable rights are not laws at all...they are in fact lawless edicts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson