Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: endthematrix
"...and the fact some fossils have feathers.

Ah yes, Areopterix, the Piltdown Bird, or better-than-Piltdown Bird. Discovered by enthusiasts in the back yard as soon as the ink was dry on Origin of the Species and then ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

30 posted on 04/14/2007 11:47:15 PM PDT by cookcounty (No journalist ever won a prize for reporting the facts. --Telling big stories? Now that's a hit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: cookcounty

The pieces were of other unknown bird-like feathered dinosaurs. The tail turned out to be from a Microraptor.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1248079.stm


31 posted on 04/15/2007 12:01:09 AM PDT by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: cookcounty
Ah yes, Areopterix, the Piltdown Bird, or better-than-Piltdown Bird. Discovered by enthusiasts in the back yard as soon as the ink was dry on Origin of the Species and then ........

Yeah, there are some antievolutionists who think Archaeopteryx fossils are faked, especially the feathers. But this is really dumb stuff, even for creationists.

These fossils were not found in anybody's "backyard". They come from the Solnhofen Limestone of Germany, which has been quarried extensively because of it's unique economic value (e.g. extremely fine-grained texture, used to be used for lithography).

There are 8 or 9 different Archaeopteryx fossils that would have had to have been "hoaxed". One was found before Darwin published, but only recognized (and the feather impressions noted) years later. Others came out of the ground long after the supposed "hoaxing".

The creationist hoax theory theory, however, does give is the interesting (but hardly unique) circumstance of some antievolutionists claiming that Archaeopteryx is 100% reptile, and nothing to do with birds; while other antievolutionists claim that it is 100% bird and not a reptile at all; both groups agreeing only that it is certainly not transitional between the two.

52 posted on 04/15/2007 11:17:23 AM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson