Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ‘End of Men’ is postponed
The Times ^ | 4/16/2007 | Mark Henderson

Posted on 04/15/2007 5:59:15 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

You would have thought that the prospect of an end to male infertility would be enough to get the media excited. But when news broke that scientists had taken a step towards creating artificial sperm from stem cells, a funny thing happened. Most commentators didn’t seem bothered that medicine may soon be able to help men who make no sperm to become fathers. All they wanted to do was to debate the “end of men”.

The story went like this. If it proves possible to make working sperm from a man’s bone marrow, couldn’t you make them from female cells too? Then lesbians could become fathers by fertilising their partners’ eggs. Their children would bear the genes of two women. Men would become redundant, unnecessary even to fill the turkey baster. Cue much outraged speculation about the dawn of an Amazonian dystopia.

The indignant railing against Nature usurped, of course, conveniently forgets that most women are not lesbians and will always find it more fun to breed the old-fashioned way. It also ignores the science, because none of this is remotely close to happening.

Artificial sperm are going to be hard enough to make from male stem cells; there is an even bigger biological barrier to creating them for women that many experts think will never be overcome. To make a working sperm cell, you seem to need a Y chromosome and women, by definition, are always going to be lacking in that department. “Female fatherhood” could pose ethical questions if it were possible — though I’m not convinced they are big ones — but it almost certainly isn’t. We may as well worry about the moral implications of raising the dead.

Such thought experiments are often harmless. Not this one. Impassioned debate about the implausible is obscuring the real purpose of this research and risks turning public opinion against it for the wrong reasons. This technology could allow boys sterilised by cancer treatment, who are too young to bank sperm, to father their own genetic children. It will help men, not threaten them. Silly fears about lesbian dads are an irrelevance today, and may never amount to more than science fiction. Bioethical bridges are best crossed as we come to them. The Vatican is growing uneasy about evolution. Although his predecessor endorsed it as “more than a hypothesis”, Pope Benedict XVI thinks it is “not a complete, scientifically proven theory” and has come close to backing creationism in its new guise of intelligent design. His reason: “We cannot haul 10,000 generations into the laboratory.

Not with humans, true. But as a comment on P. Z. Myers’s magnificent Pharyngula blog points out, bacteria take only 200 days to cover so much evolutionary ground. Scientists study this all the time and the results fit Darwin’s theory rather well. Even if we can’t repeat human evolution in the lab, we should at least haul the Bible out from it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/15/2007 5:59:16 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Men would become redundant, unnecessary even to fill the turkey baster.

No, you still need a human wallet to pay for everything.

2 posted on 04/15/2007 6:01:47 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog; bruinbirdman
>> Men would become redundant, unnecessary even to fill the turkey baster.

> No, you still need a human wallet to pay for everything.

I want to shake hands with the guy who can "fill" a turkey baster, in anything under a month.

Well, wait... maybe not "shake hands"....

3 posted on 04/15/2007 6:54:11 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"Then lesbians could become fathers by fertilising their partners’ eggs."

Cheer up! The same stem cells can be used to make uteruses! Good news for both gay men and gay women!

In fact--each partner could make both ova and spermatozoa. Each could fertilize his/her partner's ova with his/her spermat...uh...

This is getting pretty complicated.

But it is beginning to make a case for gay marriage...uh

...I think...uh...I'm getting confused...uh...

4 posted on 04/15/2007 7:48:53 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Marxism works only in the minds of sociopaths and morons. The Democrat Party is the S&M Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"To make a working sperm cell, you seem to need a Y chromosome"

That's easy. Just snip a leg off of an X-chromosome, and presto! A Y!

5 posted on 04/15/2007 7:53:52 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Marxism works only in the minds of sociopaths and morons. The Democrat Party is the S&M Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

LOL ... snorting water all over my keyboard.


6 posted on 04/15/2007 9:23:29 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randog

And also you need men to blame for everything wrong in the world.


7 posted on 04/15/2007 9:41:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

That’s right. Everybody is obsolete. We need to get rid of the people and go back to being stem cells as Nature intended.


8 posted on 04/15/2007 9:46:46 PM PDT by Nick Danger (www.vvlf.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

How about “nod” in their general direction.


9 posted on 04/15/2007 9:49:09 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
>> I want to shake hands with the guy who can "fill" a turkey baster, in anything under a month. Well, wait... maybe not "shake hands"....

> How about “nod” in their general direction.

You mean, just a tip of the head?

10 posted on 04/15/2007 11:46:32 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson