Are you saying it should be stricter? 90 days? 120 days? Once a year? I am not disagreeing with you if that is the case.
I think it is more likely that you are being sarcastic and saying since it didn’t work here there should be no restrictions whatsoever. Why is it that it is always all or nothing for some conservatives. Everything is not black or white.
global warming... is it not possible/likely humans have some impact (even minimal) so it may be a good idea to control it before it gets out of control?
smoking... just because that one person you know smoked 3 packs a day lived to be 95 does not mean that smoking is not bad for you.
seat belts... even though there may have been one person in a million that was killed because they wore a seatbelt does not make it wise to never wear one.
How about making steps in the right direction. Improve your odds a little bit.
Are you on the correct forum?
Just asking.
To answer just a few things here, when you permit the government to dole out the articles that are your RIGHT to own, are you not giving up that right?
Global warming is an insidious attempt to slam the average guy with a global tax.
The one worlders are messing their pants trying to get that one.
Your post shows the same “logic” exhibited by most nanny state “Liberals” -
no cost benefit analysis.
If this “logic” were applied to other things, no one would be allowed to own an automobile or a swimming pool.
and Teddy Kennedy...why is that bloated, drunken murderer still driving?