Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION BAN
Fox News Channel ^ | 18 April 2007 | Fox News Channel

Posted on 04/18/2007 7:14:49 AM PDT by Spiff

Edited on 04/18/2007 8:48:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long-awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench.

The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; bashrudy; bush; cultureoflife; duncandoughnuts; gop; helphillarywin; infanticide; pba; presidentbush; prolife; republicancongress; rudyisbad; scotus; slamonrudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 921-933 next last
To: Aquinasfan

Praise be to God. Hey, we’re trying down here Big Guy.


201 posted on 04/18/2007 8:02:19 AM PDT by rbmillerjr ("Message to radical jihadis...come to my hood, it's understood ------ it's open season" Stuck Mojo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Rudy Giuliani will NOT cut it!

Amen!

202 posted on 04/18/2007 8:02:21 AM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
This day, several babies will live, thanks to this SC decision.

I've read that about two thousand partial-birth abortions are performed each year.

203 posted on 04/18/2007 8:03:17 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Admin Moderator
The Mods know who puts the keywords in.

If they are inappropriate, they know who has done it.

204 posted on 04/18/2007 8:03:24 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops. NOW more than ever!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Great news!


205 posted on 04/18/2007 8:03:40 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

The “personhood” of the unborn is not recognized in U.S. law so if the Court is to rule on that basis then U.S. law first needs to change in that regard.

FYI: This Macchiavellian ends-justify-the-means approach to the law inevitably turns around and bites you in the butt when it’s your pet issue on the other side of a ruling..

But I will grant you that the Supremes have so contorted the law in the past 40 years that this is all just tilting at windmills.

PS. A federal government that doesn’t have the power to tell the states to ban a procedure also doesn’t have the power to tell the states to un-ban a procedure...


206 posted on 04/18/2007 8:04:35 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Ruth Bader Ginsburg reaction to todays decision:


207 posted on 04/18/2007 8:04:39 AM PDT by Republican Red (America is our home team, if you don't want to root for the home team then get out of the stadium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Outstanding ping.


208 posted on 04/18/2007 8:04:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

THEIR our many of us who have been bashed been called Bushbots ect. I am proud to have been on the right side of this issue with My PRESIDENT.

I love President Bush, and continue to pray, support and encourage him. When the world is against him, he has always been strong and God will bless him and continue to bless our country with this type of decession.


209 posted on 04/18/2007 8:04:47 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

To reiterate, Casey explicitly rejected the trimester framework. That’s no longer good law on the federal level.

Furthermore, it also changed the standard used for analyzing abortion laws from a stricter standard to the not-as-strict “undue burden” standard. The Court declined to overrule the central holding of Roe, but it did weaken it in that case.


210 posted on 04/18/2007 8:04:57 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I'm not as concerned about whether or not the Veep is pro-life. Sure, there is always the chance that the Veep will have to step in, but it is highly unlikely. As long as the President is strongly pro-life, or at least moderately so, but will appoint strict constructionist judges to the courts, that will work for me.

I frankly don't hold out any hope that abortion will ever be outlawed anywhere in this country again. It's possible that if Roe v Wade is overturned, and it reverts back to the states, there will be states that will severely cut back the opportunity for abortion, but I think it will always be there, at least in the first trimester.

The best I can hope for is that it is limited to REPORTED rape and incest and in the event that the LIFE of the mother is threatened. That is where most folks in this country are right now with regards to abortion anyway. They don't want to seem hard hearted toward a woman in what they perceive as an impossible situation, and they don't like the idea of abortion as back up birth control.

211 posted on 04/18/2007 8:05:25 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: JFC

Amen to that. This is where the rubber meets the roads when it comes to life issues. I am very please today that Al GVore/John Kerry is not our President.


212 posted on 04/18/2007 8:06:16 AM PDT by ShandaLear (When something is true, one need not lie to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: JFC
Amen! We have been blessed because President Bush has been obedient to God's call.

And we MUST keep praying for him, and for another choice for the SC. It could turn the tide in this holocaust of the slaughter of the unborn.

213 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:06 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops. NOW more than ever!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Rudi Giuliani is deeply saddened.
214 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:14 AM PDT by msnimje (True Conservatives will not support a pro-abortion candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Thank you President Bush!

Thanks to all the Republicans that made this happen.

Outstanding news! 

215 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:17 AM PDT by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

this is why elections matter. we must win in ‘08 to continue the progress.


216 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:19 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Hallelujia and amen.


217 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:24 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConstitutionandFreedom
Which part of the Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to pass abortion legislation?

I believe historically it came about when the Supreme Court found an overwhelming (and overwhelmingly vague!) federal "privacy" right in a birth control sale case. I forget the name of the case at the moment, but Roe depended on it.

218 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:32 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: bcbuster
As much as I want partial birth abortion to be banned, I am having a really hard time seeing how this was an issue for Congress to take up.

The rationale (and the one Ron Paul used to vote for the ban when faced with the same quandry) is that the Supreme Court wrongly federalized the issue of abortion when it decided Roe v. Wade. Therefore, Congress has the right to legislate abortion law and pass laws and initiate legal action to lessen the scope and effect of Roe, only so long as that decision exists.

219 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:50 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

It’s worth noting that quite a few Democrats voted with the GOP on this one, too. It’s kinda funny how you don’t seem to hear much about that.


220 posted on 04/18/2007 8:07:58 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 921-933 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson