Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Nope. See the 14th Amendment.

What is your rationale behind this statement. BTW, I am familiar with the due process clause of the 14th amendment and if the SCOTUS felt that it applied to the unborn then Roe would have been ruled in the opposite manner.

432 posted on 04/18/2007 9:52:27 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
What is your rationale behind this statement. BTW, I am familiar with the due process clause of the 14th amendment and if the SCOTUS felt that it applied to the unborn then Roe would have been ruled in the opposite manner.

I'm talking about Congress having the authority to ban PBA because persons are being deprived of their life without due process of law. My point has nothing to do with the brain-dead baby-killers on the '73 Court.

481 posted on 04/18/2007 10:26:41 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson