Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: writeblock
Oh, please.

“I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights,” Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. - CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999

Guiliani is not going to be good for pro-lifers. Period.

You can call a turd a rose all you want, it's still a turd.

28 posted on 04/18/2007 10:27:55 AM PDT by kevkrom (Al Gore is to Global Warming as L. Ron Hubbard is to Scientology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

“Guiliani is not going to be good for pro-lifers. Period.”

Santorum was good for pro-lifers—and they stabbed him in the back. So I would put it another way: single-issue social conservatives are bad for the Republican Party. Nor would their preferred candidates win any blue or purple states. It’s time to start thinking outside the box.


119 posted on 04/18/2007 11:28:59 AM PDT by writeblock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson