To: oceanview
THose are rights they already have. They don’t need domestic partnership in order to do any of those things. Also, they can still BOTH get Social Security, which is why they threw in seniors, so it doesn’t look discriminatory. However, married couples do not have the same benefit.
15 posted on
04/21/2007 1:57:42 PM PDT by
gidget7
(2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
To: gidget7
This is a stepping stone for marriage for sure. Why not let everyone get these partnerships for the benefits? Maybe a bisexual is in love with two people, and the three would like the benefits? Why should Washington be discrimatory to them?
16 posted on
04/21/2007 2:35:48 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson