Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Right...
That’s fine, babe. I understand, but hate can be a blinding thing. And tactics should be well-considered.
From my meager understanding of things, Rangers don’t shoot from the hip either.
Politics ain’t purty, agreed.
It appears like that’s your plan. Is it?
Shucks, I forgot...but I had to help my hubby bring stuff in from the car, so I have an excuse...
Am I wrong? Show me where!
I had five separate plane flights that weekend since my bro was in Reno. I was in line at airports or flying more than I was actually on the ground in Vegas at the TI. That Sunday rounded out the weekly nicely. I don't drink but it appeared others were feeling no pain. Friva was great. Laura Ingraham, Michael Jackson (b-day for his first son) at TI, meeting JR and freepers from everywhere. It was 120 then. Pretty darn hot imo.
Show me proof in what he said you nitwit...
Ditto's & thanks for the response.
Yes, Ronald Reagan would run as hard as he could against the RINO. But, he wouldn’t take down the party doing it.
***Is that what you think is happening on this thread?
Why thank you! I think it’s the best one verse summary of the way to live...
As a member of Iowa’s Republican State Central Committee, I watched Mr. Forbes up close and personal from the first days he began to run for president in ‘96. He started on the left in that election cycle, though it was carefully couched in the best Madison-Avenue-bought verbiage money could buy. After losing that year, he decided he needed to appeal to Christian conservatives to succeed. So, he morphed into something completely different leading into 2000. Only problem is, like several of these shapeshifters this year, he could just never get it all the way right. He was a phony then, and he’s a phony now. His support for Rooty is just the latest confirmation of my opinion.
See post 14,038.
Like Alan “The Huckster” Keyes the only phony that I voted for...
I was responding to your hateful, whining, view toward FReepers. Anyone who wants to can go back and see that this is the case.
“I concede that Rudy is a “liberal,”
That’s a good place to call it a night lol...
“but I think the Rudy folks that were on FR were conservatives, I believe they proved it over time. I won’t agree that they should not argue strenuously and freeper-like”
I can’t agree. They constantly abused anybody who dared to question Pres. Bush on policies where he left conservatives in the lerch (Miers,CFR,borders,spending)...They were being good Repubs, not conservatives. Now above you talk about their right to argue strenuously for their candidate (Giuliani)...yet you claimed the onus was on them to argue Giulianis conservatism. But they really havent outside of WOT, some questionable tax/spend policies. What they did to push the owner over the top is to start denigrating conservative candidates and RWR so as to somehow, tactically make Giuliani look better...that was the line he drew over and over, even to individual posters. Yet they still insisted on doing it right in his face, even after he warned them.
I’ve had that car in the shop all week, BTW.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s gunna hurt,,,they are a reeel pain in the @$$ when
something skrooos-up...very nice car IMO...;0)
It's not unusual for politicians to change their minds on various issues. After all, it was Keyes who first thought the issue of slave reparations was an outrage then ended up supporting it himself.
Does he still insist we owe slave reparations?
CINOs who push a liberal candidate onto this socon forum in a rude manner are part of the FOUNDATION? Then why don’t we just change the mission statement of FR, such as the part where it says,
“As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.