Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
I loved Reagan but I ask you whose your candidate? Will he win the primaries? If not are you going to take some responsibility for the election of Hillary Clinton.
Yes, Jim banned Peach.
She sleeps with the fishes.
For the first time in FR History, we’ve banned people that even Libert Post won’t take. Maybe Clown Posse?
I get the banned/suspended for both of those, so I don’t know why you are having problems.
Don't you get it, all liberals are the antichrist. What is going to matter is if you can shed your fear of Hillary and vote your conscience. Are you going to let the media tell you who you should vote for?
Hillary may not even win and Rudy may not even win. If the media picks you, you are in trouble. The media hasn't picked a winner in a long time. Remember Coward Dean? And wasn't Kerry ahead in the polls too?
Everybody relax, Rudy is not going to win, if we can find a Conservative, who can convince the people like Reagan did, that they can champion our values the best.
I don’t think it helped her when she compared Giuliani to Reagan who (in her world) was pro-choice and signed the most pro-abortion law in the nation.
She never did offer any proof of her assertion.
I guess a party is in order?
I suggest reading this thread to find out. Also, Jim’s explanation is at 1671. She had been given warning.
What you are saying is that you don’t really care what happens to the troops now that the demonrats are in charge.
It was all predictable, but in your mind, well worth the gloat!
“I guess a party is in order?”
Huh?
Okay someone just FReep mailed me. If you go to an active member’s homepage and then type the banned member’s name in the “view homepage” field, it brings up the “nobody by that name” message. But if you click directly on their name from one of their posts, you get the “banned or suspended” page. Weird, I don’t remember it ever being that way before.
Maybe some of them are just getting a “sit out” as opposed to a permanent ban.
One thing is certainly clear, FR is all about gays and abortions and NOTHING at all about national security.
In the '06 elections, 13 million votes were cast for the Libertarian Party (state, local, etc). THIRTEEN MILLION!!! That's unbelievable.
I submit that many of those votes were conservatives frustrated with the contined movement to the left of the Republican Party.
If you want to elect Hillary--I can't think of a better thing to do, than DIVIDE and SPLIT the Republican Party by isolating and driving away the base.
If you want to DIVIDE AND SPLIT the Republican Party WIDE OPEN---
JULIEANNIE IS JUST THE MAN FOR THE JOB!!
Half of whom?
What do you base that statement on?
No one is even talking issues right now.
Relax, you don't have to make your mind up now.
Let's let this unfold. In a straw Poll in Spartenburg, Hunter pulled in third right behind Rudy, who was behind McCain. Hunter has no name and no money and he scored well. More bang for the buck, if you ask me. Clinton was a no name before he won the Demoratic nomination.
We will have to wait and see what Fred does.
The question I have is, why all the sudden are Republicans believing the media when they say we need a liberal to beat a liberal? Horse Hockey. That is the only way they are going to make sure they get a liberal in the White House.
Please don't believe the media, go vote your conscience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.