Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup

“How’s that for a straight answer?”

That’s a pretty lousy straight answer.
In fact, Rudy and Hillary ARE the current front-runners.
Of course, things may change. Insofar as Rudy is concerned, I can even join you in hoping that things WILL change...

But, if the election is between Rudy and Hillary - WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?
A third party candidate? I consider that a wasted vote, and another vote that helps put Her HIghness in office... can we at least agree that that’s the WORST CASE SCENARIO?


16,176 posted on 04/30/2007 10:28:56 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16156 | View Replies ]


To: Pravious

“But, if the election is between Rudy and Hillary - WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?
A third party candidate? I consider that a wasted vote, and another vote that helps put Her HIghness in office... can we at least agree that that’s the WORST CASE SCENARIO?”

Much of the GOP establishment has jumped on the Giuliani bandwagon. It is they who would be voting for Hillary by that very act, because she will win. However, I have complete faith in the establishment GOP and hangers’ on - that they will use their lack of principle to jump right off of the Giuliani bandwagon when he begins his fade.


16,181 posted on 04/30/2007 10:33:43 AM PDT by rbmillerjr ("You tell them I'm comin...and hell's comin with me"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16176 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
That’s a pretty lousy straight answer. In fact, Rudy and Hillary ARE the current front-runners. Of course, things may change. Insofar as Rudy is concerned, I can even join you in hoping that things WILL change...

Sorry my answer was lousy. You'll have to upgrade your previous post if you want a less lousy answer, lol

Seriously now, I firmly believe that things WILL change, because as more time goes by, more and more GOP voters will come to understand that as a presidential candidate, Rudy is an empty suit. He is a LIBERAL. He is a pro-abortionist. He plays fast and loose with the Constitution. He spends money like water. His security credentials are a mirage. He is a 'divider not a uniter' and his nomination would result in the GOP being splintered, perhaps permanently.

The fact is, things aren't so rosy for the 'Rats either. There is a growing ABC (Anybody But Clinton) sentiment, which is why Barack Hussein Obama is literally neck and neck with the junior Senator from New York, and the extreme left wing (the Moron.Org types, Code Pinko, etc.) is not at all happy with Hillary Clinton, so if she moves left, she loses any possible support from the middle. If she stays in the middle, the left will eviscerate her.

But, if the election is between Rudy and Hillary - WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? A third party candidate? I consider that a wasted vote, and another vote that helps put Her Highness in office... can we at least agree that that’s the WORST CASE SCENARIO?

You can call it whatever you want, but I will never cast a vote for Rudy, nor for Hillary Clinton. They are both pro-abortion, gun-grabbing liberals and I will have nothing to do with either one of them. The respective Party organizations will be the ones responsible if their candidate(s) fail to win.

This whole 'you must vote for Rudy to keep Hillary out of the White House' is nothing but a more genteel translation of "Ja WOHL! You MUST vote for Chancellor Hitler, he is the ONLY one who can SAVE Germany!"

In times of crisis, it is a natural human tendency to want to vote for a 'strong leader' who will not only make the trains run on time, but who proclaims that he will be merciless against the enemy. But if that 'strong leader' has no moral scruples, no conscience, no principles beyond their own lust for power, then the cure will prove itself far worse than the disease.

For the GOP, Rudy is a disease. What is happening here on FR is the beginning of the cure.
16,191 posted on 04/30/2007 10:43:59 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16176 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious

“But, if the election is between Rudy and Hillary - WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?
A third party candidate? I consider that a wasted vote, and another vote that helps put Her HIghness in office... can we at least agree that that’s the WORST CASE SCENARIO?”

I know this wasn’t posted at me but I’m going to take the liberty of answering it anyway.

If all I’m given is the choice between horse poop and cow poop to eat.

I’ll starve.

I’ll be there on election day voting for conservative candidates. Both in the Primaries and in the general. Not for some limp wristed dimlight maggot that the Republican Party feels I should support.

If they Repubican Party gets it’s ass handed to it again in the 2008 general election they only have themselves to blame.

I will no longer compromise.


16,202 posted on 04/30/2007 10:58:23 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Our Forefathers roared for Liberty, their children now whine for security and safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16176 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
But, if the election is between Rudy and Hillary - WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? A third party candidate? I consider that a wasted vote, and another vote that helps put Her HIghness in office... can we at least agree that that’s the WORST CASE SCENARIO?

Yes. Send your suggestion to the RNC and tell them, no RATpublicans. Things will work out just fine should they heed that advice. Blackbird.

16,218 posted on 04/30/2007 11:36:53 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson