My point was, what those three Freepers said was still outrageous.
Wouldn't you agree?
No. I would rather see Hillary win the presidency than Giuliani. It has been said repeatedly by others, as well.
If Hillary wins, we have a united GOP fighting against her with all our strength. Her bad policies will be DEMOCRAT policies.
If Giuliani wins, nobody will fight him, the GOP will split, many people will leave the party, and his bad policies will be “Republican”.
I wouldn’t give money to Hillary, but I obviously don’t think it is outrageous to say that you would never vote for Rudy. I might not vote for him either.
Still, whether I think it’s outrageous was not the question, it was simply if any freeper had actually said they would vote for Hillary.
This was actually important, because as you may remember, a few days ago we had a big fight over the Washington Times reporting that Rev. Land, of the Southern Baptist Convention, had said he would “vote for Hillary”.
The Rudy supporters posted it to stir up anger and hatred against him, and to smear religious people who were so “far right” that they would crazily vote for Hillary.
It turned out the reported got the story wrong (as many already told them — the pro-rudy people are quick to believe rediculous things if it advances their cause).
So I wanted to make sure that the report of freepers saying they’d vote for hillary was true. I’ve not gotten confirmation yet.