[mkjessup]

If every poster here who supports Rudy, or is considering supporting Rudy is banned, it would mean ZIP in regard to Rudy's candidacy, but would instead, IMO, only negatively impact FR.

Don't kid yourself sugar, if FR cleans house, based upon member poll results, it will mean nothing but the loss of 9.9 percent of FINOs who won't be posting that Rudy-drivel day in, day out, and it quite frankly WOULD have an undetermined impact on Rudy's already swirling-the-bowl candidacy, because if FR purged itself of all the RudyBots, THAT is the kind of story that shows up in the political blogs, gets picked up by the news outlets, and while it might not be the final nail in Rudy's political coffin, it would be a significant nail.

.... if they are promoting ANYTHING favorable to that stealth-'Rat/RINO-Rudy, they've got no business here...
Well, if Jim wants this to be a "Rudy-free-site" or an "anti-Rudy-site" - he should state that policy and apply it.

Works for me!

[CharlesWayneCT]

In my opinion, the rudy people were looking for something to pick them up. They are tired of losing every argument here, tired of not being able to defend their candidate to conservatives, and afraid that if they keep losing it will catch on.

It looks like some of them were chosen to be “sacrificial lambs”, to say things to get banned so they might gain sympathy, or at least to go off and claim that conservatives can’t win the argument against them and so we banned them.

I don’t know how to explain attacking the honor of Jim Robinson, telling the pro-life conservatives here that they will be responsible for the death of babies if they don’t pick a pro-abortion candidate, or arguing that the Republican Party should be lead by a trained monkey so long as it means Hillary isn’t president.