Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can We Accept Another Va. Tech? (CBS News: Inevitable Without Stricter Gun Laws)
CBS News ^ | April. 22, 2007 | Bob Schieffer

Posted on 04/23/2007 7:36:17 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: presidio9

I believe B.S. had Ben Stein (more BS) on in a short segment where Stein asserted that “Americans need to get over their love affair with guns.” I thought Stein was a “conservative.” Nix that idea.


41 posted on 04/23/2007 8:26:13 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

One week has passed. The libs are all using the media to call for seizing legal guns from law-abiding citizens and leaving them in the hands of criminals who obey no laws.


42 posted on 04/23/2007 8:27:17 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

>>>Journalism 101<<<
Newspeak: “powerful forces oppose”
In English: the Constitution, the American public oppose

Newspeak: “tightening the gun laws”
English: gun prohibition


43 posted on 04/23/2007 8:33:46 AM PDT by tumblindice (Rudy Tenuta's got a squeezebox, conservatives never sleep at night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

“(Personally, I am for campus bans on undergrad student guns generally, because I think stupid accidents from immature students are far more likely than a wacko acting out.)”

Oh really? I can’t seem to recall any of the accidental campus shootings you seem so fearful of. Care to state your statistical basis for this? Or when you say you “think” so, are you really meaning you “feel” so?
The 2nd Ammendment’s protections apply to all of us. Not just to those whom you deem worthy.


44 posted on 04/23/2007 8:35:47 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
But Virginia Tech must have shown us one thing: The current safeguards are not working, and unless something changes, it IS only a matter of time until what we saw — or something worse — happens again.

That's right. A gun free zone will only make it easier for evil men to do evil things.

The "current safeguards" are not safeguards at all. Virginia Tech students were sitting ducks that day and this fact should serve as a wake up call to all those who seek to protect themselves against evil.

45 posted on 04/23/2007 8:43:00 AM PDT by SaveTheChief (Chief Illiniwek (1926-2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1

Good link...


46 posted on 04/23/2007 8:43:42 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly (Grassroots Conservatism at its finest...VOTE DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

This really is a moot point.

I think you need to be 21 to own a handgun and at least that for a ccw.

Most 21 year olds are not freshmen.


47 posted on 04/23/2007 8:44:21 AM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Fearful? No, I just think that undergrad’s tend to be very immature and DRINK a HELL of alot. They are a huge majority on campus and they tend to be in large enclaves all alone without any “outside” influence.

No stats, just surmising. (And that is THINKING, based on admittedly few observations over some years; but it is not just “feeling”.)

And I’m not interested in disarming every single person. I think higher students and faculty and staff should all be allowed, mostly to balance if this kind of psycho thing happens.

But if the campus wants to allow everyone to be armed - se la vie. I’m not that upset about it. I just think they’ll regret it - the likelihood of general day-to-day problems is greater than ever having a homicidal maniac show up and blow everyone to pieces.

OTOH, I just now find out it was only the last 5 years or so that VA banned guns for anyone on campus (not sure of policy before that, except now noone is allowed). So, it’s very possible before that, few mishaps were happening.

As for your comment about “ALL of us” - I doubt that. People here are clamoring for more gun control for nutcases like Cho. So I guess the class of “possibly unstable” doesn’t count in your 2A protections.


48 posted on 04/23/2007 8:44:50 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: knuthom
The current laws relating to mental illness not only result in more people homeless and on the street.

Cho was not on the street, and he had not comitted any crime. Harmless people write incredibly disturbing and violent things all the time. Should Quentin Turentino or Bret Easton Ellis be forcibly incarcerated?

When you start making laws to crack-down on the supposedly mentally dangerous, you are headed down a slippery slope. Bear in mind that the experts in the mental health professions tend to be liberal. For example, many conservatives believe that homosexuality is a mental disorder, just as many liberals feel the same way about "hate speech/hate crimes." Are you prepared to undergo forcible reprogramming the next time you call somebody a faggot?

Bear in mind that Cho was evaluated and deemed a danger to himself, but not others.

49 posted on 04/23/2007 8:53:17 AM PDT by presidio9 (Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Changes: As far as colleges campuses in shall-issue states are concerned, allowing those with CCW permits to carry would be a good first step.

When I was a senior at a large Southern University in the late 1970s, most of us in Army ROTC had CCW permits and frequently carried on campus and to class. I majored in Criminal Justice so there were also cops in my classes who were routinely armed and everybody knew who else was armed. No problems whatsoever. NONE. Not a single one.

Of course no weapons were permitted in the dorms and I was sharing a house off campus with other army cadets. Even normal students not in ROTC were often seen with shotguns or rifles in a vehicle rack during the various hunting seasons. Again, no problems, at all. A lot of folks (including students) in the area fed themselves by harvesting wild game. Heck, I did too.

Cutting down on the meat bill by killing deer during the season allows a bigger party budget. However, ALCOHOL and GUNPOWDER never mix. That's also pretty basic to growing up and attending school in the deep south. Sure there are always hunting accidents. But none involving students during the time I was in school....at least none of which I'm aware.

Things seem to have changed since I was in school. Now the globalist liberal cabal is in charge all over the nation. Last time I checked, the proud Army ROTC programs were in danger of being evicted from the campus by the Administration. When I was in school, we had the #1 biggest noncompulsory ROTC Program in the nation. It was a sign of student patriotism for Fraternities and Sororities to join the first and second year ROTC program. They loved it, then. The times...they are a'changin' I guess. For the worse, it seems. This is what happens when the SHEEP MENTALITY is inculcated into the student campus attitudes.

50 posted on 04/23/2007 8:53:31 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
and because powerful forces oppose tightening the gun laws, there is just not much that can be done about it.

The gun grabbing lobby, which is primarily funded six or seven figures at a time by a smattering of gazillionaire liberals in Hollywood or New York, always refers about the gun lobby as a sort of pro violence cabal funded by the evil gun industry that owns the smoky backrooms of Washington.

That's BS. There isn't some impersonal powerful force opposing tightening the gun laws, there are millions of independent gun owners who care about their rights being taken away and vote. That's all.

51 posted on 04/23/2007 8:57:36 AM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

These are the same characters who claim that war powers will subvert the Constitution.


52 posted on 04/23/2007 9:13:46 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek

>Barack Obama started out deploring
the violence of Virginia Tech as yet another example of the pervasive
violence of our society: the violence of Iraq, the violence of Darfur,
the violence of . . . er, hang on, give him a minute. Ah, yes,
outsourcing: ‘’the violence of men and women who . . . suddenly have the
rug pulled out from under them because their job has moved to another
country.” And let’s not forget the violence of radio hosts: ‘’<

Not a word is said about the slavish devotion of certain professors to the ideals set forth by the likes of Karl Marx and his ilk. Look at the hordes of brainwashed college students who show up at staged protests against this country’s ideals, and it’s defense of freedom.

Cho didn’t come up with his all-consuming rage against the rich out of thin air, after all. He was fed communist, anarchist dreck for 4 years.

He learned all to well to hate.


53 posted on 04/23/2007 9:16:28 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
(Personally, I am for campus bans on undergrad student guns generally, because I think stupid accidents from immature students are far more likely than a wacko acting out.)

Can you provide a single example, or are you just speaking based on your personal feelings? I can give a counter example: You can carry on Utah U -- 44,000 students -- if you have a permit. There has been no increase in gun accidents etc. No "kids gone wild with guns." You know what there also hasn't been any of? Mass shootings.

54 posted on 04/23/2007 9:26:01 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Spok
"...his right against unreasonable search and seizure..."

He lived in a dorm owned and operated by Virginia Tech. Technically, Virginia Tech was his landlord. They could have gone in at any time.

55 posted on 04/23/2007 9:49:59 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * Allen for U.S. Senate for VA in '08 * Thompson/Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: piytar

I already answered this stuff later. Amazing how you guys ascribed to me the same concept, “feelings”.

As for no mass killings - as I clearly said, they are rare no matter what.


56 posted on 04/23/2007 10:37:20 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is what gets me. It seems while (generally) conservatives are fighting against increasing gun/weapon restrictions/laws, they are calling for “better” incarceration of “mentally ill”. This is definitely a liberal-type thing to call for more laws, only liberals usually want only criminals and mentals unleashed, and everyone else locked up for things such as not wearing seatbelts or bicycle helmets or for putting recyclables in the trash. Definitely have to be careful of calls for incarcerating allegedly “mentally ill” people - SINCE IT IS *NOT* CONCRETE what is “ill” any way.


57 posted on 04/23/2007 10:43:13 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Bob Schieffer is a blithering idiot. His article inverts myth and reality. VA Tech happened because guns were BANNED from the campus. It was the kind of gun free-world liberals wanted. "Tightening" the nation's gun laws would NOT have prevented the crime. Does Schieffer even KNOW we have 30,000 gun laws on the books in America? I doubt it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

58 posted on 04/23/2007 11:24:58 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Let's have more gun free zones! We're so sure that next time, homicidal psychopaths will really really obey the law! And Drive By/MSM journalists like Schieffer wonder why the public has such a low opinion of them.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

59 posted on 04/23/2007 11:27:18 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
CBS = Crapola Broadcasting System

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

60 posted on 04/23/2007 11:28:21 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson