Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roadside bomb pierces Challenger tank in Iraq
The Guardian (U.K.) ^ | April 24, 2007 | Richard Norton-Taylor

Posted on 04/23/2007 6:01:08 PM PDT by jdm

A Challenger 2 tank - the [British] army's heaviest weapon - has been penetrated by a roadside bomb in Iraq, leaving the driver with serious injuries, the Ministry of Defence confirmed yesterday. It is the first time a Challenger has been damaged by an improvised explosive device in this way.

The driver of the tank, who has not been named, is understood to be recovering in a British hospital after both his legs were amputated. Another soldier in the four-man crew suffered minor injuries.

The incident, which has serious implications for the safety of British soldiers, happened on April 6 in the Hyall Shuala district in western Basra, the day after four British soldiers were killed when their Warrior armoured vehicle was also hit by a roadside bomb. The MoD does not always reveal attacks on British forces unless they led to fatalities. The tank was damaged, but not destroyed, as its crew were carrying out routine duties.

An MoD spokesman said: "This was not in any way new technology - the device involved was the same type of shaped charge that we have seen used very regularly. No one has ever said Challenger tanks are impenetrable. We have always said a big enough bomb will defeat any armour and any vehicle."


(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: british; challenger; iraq; tank

1 posted on 04/23/2007 6:01:14 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm

At what point do we stop calling these shaped charge landmines “improvised”?


2 posted on 04/23/2007 6:05:52 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Let me fix it for them...

The incident, which has serious implications for the safety of British soldiers insurgent terrorists, You cannot let this sort of thing go on, you have to take it to THEM!

3 posted on 04/23/2007 6:06:47 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The Guardian would never say it, but it sounds like another Iranian weapon was probably used.

Unfortunately Bush and Blair seem unwilling to say so too.


4 posted on 04/23/2007 6:22:03 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
At what point do we stop calling these shaped charge landmines “improvised”?

Yep...I've been thinking the same thing for quite awhile now. I sincerely hope the military 'thinkers' will change their acronyms. "IED" is long a passe term.

5 posted on 04/23/2007 6:26:00 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Take it to THEM! I agree like a few IEDs of our own in Teheran would make them think twice.
6 posted on 04/23/2007 7:20:28 PM PDT by DenverCossack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson