To: Al Simmons
I see a lot of Rudy support around here. I don’t think I can agree that supporting Rudy will get you in trouble. I also think there is nothing wrong with JimRob wanted to derail a candidate he does not like.
On the other hand, I agree that there is a great deal or rabid disagreement with those who are not “ideological purists”. But, that seems to be the nature of modern debate.
47 posted on
04/24/2007 10:28:13 AM PDT by
T.Smith
To: T.Smith
I see a lot of Rudy support too.
He has some good points but I have this feeling that if he should win he'd wind up treating conservatives like he did wives 1 and 2.
163 posted on
04/24/2007 1:51:34 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
To: T.Smith
On the other hand, I agree that there is a great deal or rabid disagreement with those who are not ideological purists. But, that seems to be the nature of modern debate. There is nothing more brutal then inter-ideological warfare.
177 posted on
04/24/2007 2:05:43 PM PDT by
Smogger
(It's the WOT Stupid)
To: T.Smith
Maybe I’m biased, but I kid you not, I think about 90% of the animosity was generated by Rudybots acting like we’re all idiots ready to help Osama. The ones that were flushed were (for the most part) the ones that were projecting that attitude. The Rudy supporters still here are the ones who have been acting respectful, and I welcome further debate with them.
546 posted on
04/25/2007 6:05:23 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson