Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m not sure I get it. Sure, at first they announced merely that he was killed in action. But didn’t it come out within a couple of weeks that it had in fact been friendy fire?

Wouldn’t there have be an investigation before an official determination of fratricide was announced?

So what?


22 posted on 04/24/2007 11:12:05 AM PDT by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius
Sure, at first they announced merely that he was killed in action. But didn’t it come out within a couple of weeks that it had in fact been friendy fire?

Wouldn’t there have be an investigation before an official determination of fratricide was announced?

So what?

BINGO 3X!

25 posted on 04/24/2007 11:14:41 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The Drive-By Media is attempting to Cronkite the Iraq war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
I’m not sure I get it. Sure, at first they announced merely that he was killed in action. But didn’t it come out within a couple of weeks that it had in fact been friendy fire?

Wouldn’t there have be an investigation before an official determination of fratricide was announced?

So what?

Exactly.

A few weeks to evaluate the actual cause is more than reasonable. I remember it annunced that it was friendly fire not that long after the announcement of his death. If it was covered up for years, that would be a different scenario.

This family, unfortunately, thinks it is entitled to more than other military families due to their son's fame. It is really quite embarrassing.

41 posted on 04/24/2007 11:23:07 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
I’m not sure I get it. Sure, at first they announced merely that he was killed in action. But didn’t it come out within a couple of weeks that it had in fact been friendy fire?

Wouldn’t there have be an investigation before an official determination of fratricide was announced?

So what?

Exactly right on the whole - The bottom line is a few details could have been done differently (his Bro should have been told earlier of the likelihood of what happened).

But the bottom line is Ranger Pat Tillman was a hell of a man who died on this shield while taking the fight to the enemy. He was leading from the front. God bless the man.

Disgusting what those on the left are now doing.....And how they are using his death to indirectly help those enemies that Ranger Tillman was taking the fight to when he died.

101 posted on 04/24/2007 4:39:09 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson